TITLE

Tanzanian farmers' knowledge and attitudes to GM biotechnology and the potential use of GM crops to provide improved levels of food security. A Qualitative Study

AUTHOR(S)
Lewis, Christopher P.; Newell, James N.; Herron, Caroline M.; Nawabu, Haidari
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10, p407
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Genetically Modified (GM) crops have been championed as one possible method to improve food security and individual nutritional status in sub Saharan Africa. Understanding and acceptability of GM crop technology to farmers and consumers have not been assessed. We developed a qualitative research study involving farmers as both producers and consumers to gauge the understanding of GM crop technology, its acceptability, and identifying issues of concern. Methods: Nineteen individual interviews (10 male and 9 female) and five mixed gender focus group discussions with local farmers were conducted in 3 regions in Tanzania. Analysis took place concurrently with data collection. Following initial interviews, subsequent questions were adjusted based on emerging themes. Results: Understanding, awareness and knowledge of GM crop technology and terminology and its potential risks and benefits was very poor in all regions. Receptivity to the potential use of GM crops was, however, high. Respondents focused on the potential benefits of GM crops rather than any potential longer term health risks. A number of factors, most significantly field trial data, would influence farmers' decisions regarding the introduction of GM crop varieties into their farming practice. Understanding of the potential improved health provision possible by changes in agricultural practice and food-related decision making, and the health benefits of a diet containing essential vitamins, minerals and micronutrients is also poor in these communities. Conclusion: This study forms a basis from which further research work can be undertaken. It is important to continue to assess opinions and attitudes of farmers and consumers in sub Saharan Africa towards potential use of GM technologies whilst highlighting the importance of the relationship between agriculture, health and development. This will allow people in the region to make accurate, informed decisions about whether they believe use of GM biotechnology is an appropriate way in which to tackle issues of food security, provide improved health and drive development.
ACCESSION #
52840528

 

Related Articles

  • ATTACK OF THE MUTANT RICE. Gunther, Marc // Fortune;7/9/2007, Vol. 156 Issue 1, p74 

    The article reports on the damage done to the U.S. rice industry by the spread of genetically engineered rice into populations of regular rice. When the contamination became public, foreign markets like Europe and Asia, where opposition to transgenic foods is strong, stopped buying U.S. rice....

  • Development of Agriculture Biotechnology in Pakistan. Zafar, Yusuf // Journal of AOAC International;Sep/Oct2007, Vol. 90 Issue 5, p1500 

    The article reports developments in agriculture biotechnology in Pakistan. According to the author, Pakistan has made considerable progress in the research and development sector of agriculture biotechnology. The country has developed various genetically modified crops, however they remain...

  • Genetically engineered horticultural crops fail to garner following.  // Western Farm Press;6/5/2004, Vol. 26 Issue 14, p26 

    Discusses the failure of genetically engineered horticultural crops to gain a following in the U.S. Success of genetically engineered field crops; Increased research and development costs of genetically engineered horticultural crops; Non-profitability of business model; Need for separate...

  • Biotech crops needed to insure adequate supply of food, fiber. Brandon, Hembree // Southeast Farm Press;12/1/2004, Vol. 31 Issue 27, p21 

    The article reports on the requirements of the biotechnical crops. Forecasts indicate that the agricultural chemical and agricultural biotechnology markets will continue to grow over the next five years. Worldwide sales of agricultural chemicals is forecast to reach $27.3 billion by 2008....

  • How green biotech turned white and blue. Laursen, Lucas // Nature Biotechnology;May2010, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p393 

    The author investigates on the success of Argentina as one of the leading genetically modified (GM) crop producers. It highlights the rapid boom of transgenic crops in Argentina in the 1990s which critics and fans consider as a model from which other developing countries can learn. He notes that...

  • Breeding Sanity into the GM Food Debate. Cayford, Jerry // Issues in Science & Technology;Winter2003/2004, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p49 

    Examines the factors which led to the debate on the safety of genetically-modified food. Opposition of biotechnology critics to the implementation of patents on plants; Direct effects of plant patenting on farmers; Threat of biotechnology to the practice of traditional farming.

  • Biotechnology is a better term. Crabtree, Ian // Farmers Weekly;3/14/2008, p61 

    The author commends the National Farmers Union (NFU) for encouraging an intelligent debate on genetically modified (GM) crops, which, he says, could be part of the solution to the impending world food shortages and food security issues. He believes that stringent testing of these crops will...

  • Editorial: Much ado about nothing. Bright, Simon; Poole, Nigel // Journal of Commercial Biotechnology;Jan2006, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p83 

    The article reflects on the effects of growing and commercializing genetically modified (GM) crops in Europe. It questions how it came to pass that from a position of scientific leadership in crop biotechnology, Great Britain and the rest of Europe have reacted by turning its back on the growing...

  • The Hidden Cost of Genetic Engineering. Aberget, Elisabeth // Alive: Canada's Natural Health & Wellness Magazine;Jul2002, Issue 237, p18 

    Examines the economic impact of using genetically engineered crops. Comparison of profits made by farmers versus biotechnology firms; Market losses incurred by Canadian wheat farmers; Distribution of genetically modified seeds to Afghanistan farmers.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics