Single-Centre Experience of Radiation Exposure in Acute Surgical Patients: Assessment of Therapeutic Impact and Future Recommendations

Fitzmaurice, Gerard J.; Brown, Robin; Cranley, Brian; Conlon, Enda F.; Todd, R. Alan J.; O'Donnell, Mark E.
September 2010
World Journal of Surgery;Sep2010, Vol. 34 Issue 9, p2009
Academic Journal
Radiological investigations have become a key adjunct in patient management and consequently radiation exposure to patients is increasing. The study objectives were to examine the use of radiological investigations in the management of acute surgical patients and to assess whether a guideline-based radiation exposure risk/benefit analysis can aid in the choice of radiological investigation used. A prospective observational study was completed over a 12-week period from April to July 2008 for all acute surgical admissions. Data recorded included demographics, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, investigations, surgical interventions, and final clinical outcome. The use of radiological investigative modalities as an adjunct to clinical assessment was then evaluated against The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines. A total of 380 acute surgical admissions (M = 174, F = 185, children = 21) were assessed during the study period. Seven hundred thirty-four radiological investigations were performed with a mean of 1.93 investigations per patient. Based on the RCR guidelines, 680 (92.6%) radiological investigations were warranted and included 142 CT scans (19.3%), 129 chest X-rays (17.6%), and 85 abdominal X-rays (11.6%). Clinically, radiological imaging complemented surgical management in 326 patients (85.8%) and the management plan remained unchanged for the remaining 54 patients (14.2%). This accounted for an average radiation dose of 4.18 millisievert (mSv) per patient or 626 days of background radiation exposure. CT imaging was responsible for the majority of the radiation exposure, with a total of 1310 mSv (82.6%) of the total radiation exposure being attributed to CT imaging in 20.8% of acute admissions. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that 92.8% of the CT scans performed were appropriate. Radiation exposure was generally low for the majority of acute surgical admissions. However, it is recommended that CT imaging requests be evaluated carefully, particularly for patients with clinically confirmed pathologies and in younger women.


Related Articles

  • Personal dosimetry for interventional operators: when and how should monitoring be done? MARTIN, C. J. // British Journal of Radiology;Jul2011, Vol. 84 Issue 1003, p639 

    Objective: Assessment of the potential doses to the hands and eyes for interventional radiologists and cardiologists can be difficult. A review of studies of doses to interventional operators reported in the literature has been undertaken. Methods: Distributions for staff dose to relevant parts...

  • CT dose reduction in practice. Callahan, Michael J. // Pediatric Radiology;Sep2011, Vol. 41, p488 

    Greater than 10% of diagnostic imaging studies performed in developed countries are CT examinations. In the United States, as many as 60 million CT studies are performed each year, up to 7 million of which are performed in pediatric patients. In the spirit of the ALARA principle, both adult and...

  • Biologische Wirkung und Tumorrisiko diagnostischer Röntgenstrahlen. Selzer, E.; Hebar, A. // Der Radiologe;Oct2012, Vol. 52 Issue 10, p892 

    Since the introduction of ionizing radiation as a treatment and diagnostic tool in humans, scientists have been trying to estimate its side effects and potential health risks. There is now ample evidence for the principal existence of a direct relationship between higher doses and the risks of...

  • Detection of coronary calcium during standard chest computed tomography correlates with multi-detector computed tomography coronary artery calcium score. Kirsch, Jacobo; Buitrago, Ivan; Mohammed, Tan-Lucien; Gao, Tianming; Asher, Craig; Novaro, Gian // International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging;Jun2012, Vol. 28 Issue 5, p1249 

    The correlation between formal coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) determined by multi-detector CT (MDCT) and the presence of coronary calcium on standard non-gated CT chest examinations was evaluated. In 163 consecutive healthy participants, we performed screening same-day standard...

  • WHAT LIES WITHIN. Williams, Daniel // Time International (South Pacific Edition);6/7/2004, Issue 22, p52 

    The article discusses the validity of whole-body scans conducted by radiologist Gabby Reilich to discover hidden diseases that cannot be known through normal procedures. Freilich is convinced he has helped save many others in the past two years amidst opposition. Since August 2002, he has...

  • Assessing Security Risks.  // Buildings;Apr2004, Vol. 98 Issue 4, p34 

    Presents an excerpt from the "General Security Risk Assessment Guideline," issued by ASIS International.


    No abstract available.

  • The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. Milne, Fiona; Redman, Chris; Walker, James; Baker, Philip; Bradley, Julian; Cooper, Carol; De Swiet, Michael; Fletcher, Gillian; Jokinen, Mervi; Murphy, Deirdre; Nelson-Piercy, Catherine; Osgood, Vicky; Robson, Stephen; Shennan, Andrew; Tuffnell, Angela; Twaddle, Sara; Waugh, Jason // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);3/12/2005, Vol. 330 Issue 7491, p576 

    Presents information on the pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG) and specifically how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia. Reasons the guidelines are needed; Background on development of the PRECOG; Definitions of terms used in the guideline; What to do before developing a care...

  • Implementation of a competency check-off in diagnostic fluoroscopy for radiology trainees: impact on reducing radiation for three common fluoroscopic exams in children. Shah, Sweta; Desouches, Stephane; Lowe, Lisa; Kasraie, Nima; Reading, Brenton // Pediatric Radiology;Feb2015, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p228 

    Background: Fluoroscopy is an important tool for diagnosis in the pediatric population, but it carries the risk of radiation exposure. Because radiology resident education and experience in the use of fluoroscopy equipment in children vary, we implemented an intervention to standardize...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics