TITLE

Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Interior: Proper Deference

AUTHOR(S)
Waldron, Maya
PUB. DATE
May 2010
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2010, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p721
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents a court case between the Center for Biological Diversity and the Department of Interior wherein the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act and the Federal Land Policy Management Act. A dissent by Judge Tallman claimed that the majority did not give BLM proper deference for the decision. However it is concluded that the majority made a procedural legal analysis in BLM's failure and deference is not binding in this case.
ACCESSION #
52547448

 

Related Articles

  • In Brief. Garrett, Theodore L. // Trends (15339556);Nov/Dec2008, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p8 

    The article discusses several court cases in the U.S. including Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. U.S., wherein the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) committed error in resolving that the phosphorus rule of Florida for the Everglades did not change quality standards of water, U.S. v. Jho...

  • Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. Norton, 503 F.3d 836 (9th Cir. 2007). Watkins, Ivan A. // Tulane Environmental Law Journal;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 1, Special section p16 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff disconforms to the standards of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in the U.S. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit supported the partial injunction of the prohibition of coal bed methane (CBM) development in Powder River...

  • Native Cultural Protection Group Files Suit to Thwart Solar Projects in Southern Calif. Deserts. TIRADO, MICHELLE // American Indian Report;Dec2010, Vol. 25 Issue 12, p6 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by the La Cuna de Aztlan Sacred Sites Protection Circle, a Native American group who protects cultural properties and sites, to complain the decision of the Bureau of Land Management for approving six solar power plants in Mohave, Sonoran and Colorado...

  • N. Cheyenne Seek Ban on Methane Wells.  // Native American Law Digest;Jun2005, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p11 

    The article reports on efforts of the Northern Cheyenne tribe to prevent the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM) from approving coal-bed methane wells in southern Montana pending the tribe's appeal of a decision allowing limited development. The tribe and Northern Plains Resource Council filed...

  • BATTLING WITH THE BUREAU.  // National Wildlife (World Edition);Feb/Mar2005, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p61 

    Reports that the National Wildlife Federation has won a lawsuit against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management concerning the plan to rebuild roads within the Arrastra Mountain Wilderness Area. Description of the wilderness area; Provision of the Wilderness Act.

  • Windfall. Witte, Robert D. // Contract Management;Jun2005, Vol. 45 Issue 6, p46 

    Comments on the case involving Jim Phillips Contracting Inc. and the Office of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Phillips' contract with four one-year extension options; Winter suspension of work order from the BLM; Order to resume work by the BLM after the snow has melted ignored by Phillips...

  • Unsettling Development. Turner, Tom // Environmental Forum;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p32 

    Discusses the reduction of the role of government agencies as public interest intervenors in environmental cases in the U.S. Information on the decision of the U.S. Justice Department to abandon its role of defending federal laws and regulations from court challenges; Details of a settlement...

  • Environmental groups to file suit to block reopening of Ariz. mine. Geiselman, Bruce // Waste & Recycling News;9/14/2009, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p15 

    The article reports on the move of three environmental groups including the Center for Biological Diversity in filing a lawsuit against the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to bar the move of the agency to reopen the Arizona 1 uranium mine in 2009 in Arizona. The groups are against the move of the...

  • RIDE 'EM COWBOY: A CRITICAL LOOK AT BLM'S PROPOSED NEW GRAZING REGULATIONS. Feller, Joseph M. // Environmental Law (00462276);Fall2004, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1123 

    Analyzes the proposed amendments to the regulations governing livestock grazing on western public lands managed by the United States Bureau of Land Management. Suggestion that the proposed amendments would, in effect, exclude public input from critical decisions affecting important public...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics