Opportunities Exist for DOE to Provide Better Information on the Maturity of Key Technologies to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions

July 2010
GAO Reports;7/16/2010, preceding p1
Government Documents
The article presents a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) concerning the environmental impact of coal power plants. It emphasizes the role of the Department of Energy (DOE) in the development of technologies to reduce the emissions of carbon dioxide. It highlights two key technologies in reducing carbon emissions which include plant efficiency improvements and carbon capture storage.


Related Articles

  • New FutureGen invitations go out.  // Modern Power Systems;Aug2008, Vol. 28 Issue 8, p6 

    The article reports on the issuance of a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) under the FutureGen program by the Department of Energy (DoE) in the U.S. in 2008. FOA is specifically intended for the development of various clean coal power plants and carbon sequestration technology in the...

  • World's First Post-Combustion CCS Coal Unit Is Online in Canada. Reitenbach, Gail // Power;Nov2014, Vol. 158 Issue 11, p8 

    The article reports that the world's first commercial post-combustion carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) project at an operating coal-fired power plant opened on October 2, 2014 in Estevan, Saskatchewan. The project got 240 million Canadian dollars from the Canadian federal government and...

  • Cleaning up coal power.  // Geographical (Geographical Magazine Ltd.);May2009, Vol. 81 Issue 5, p10 

    The article discusses the consideration by the British Environment Secretary Ed Miliband to making carbon capture and storage (CSS) technology mandatory in coal-fired power plants. Plans to construct additional coal-powered plants have met with criticism. Topics include Milibrand's plans to...

  • US government pulls the plug on flagship clean coal project.  // New Scientist;2/9/2008, Vol. 197 Issue 2642, p6 

    The article reports that the U.S. Department of Energy announced in January, 2008, that it would not continue payment to the FutureGen project, a venture to apply carbon capture and storage (CCS) to a new coal power plant. Samuel Bodman, U.S. energy secretary, explains that the decision was...

  • Mercury Control Technologies at Coal-Fired Power Plants Have Achieved Substantial Emissions Reductions.  // GAO Reports;10/8/2009, preceding p1 

    The article reports on the study led by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to examine the reductions achieved by mercury technologies, the cost of mercury control and issues faced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in regulating mercury emissions from power plants. The...

  • Carbon capture 'has second chance'.  // Utility Week;3/30/2012, p7 

    The article deals with a report from the environmental think-tank Green Alliance, which calls on the British government to set a low carbon trajectory to drive demand for carbon capture and storage (CCS) on coal and gas plant.

  • How Clean Is Coal? Kosanovic, Lisa // Energy User News;Jun2002, Vol. 27 Issue 6, p20 

    Details the Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Program of the U.S. Department of Energy. Investment in efforts to reduce pollution from coal-burning power plants; Advantage gained by the energy industry; Enhancement of the public perception of coal.

  • Editorial: What's happening to carbon capture?  // New Scientist;2/9/2008, Vol. 197 Issue 2642, p5 

    The article presents the author's views on the need for carbon capture and storage (CCS) in coal-burning power plants. Concern is raised over U.S. energy secretary Samuel Bodman's decision to delay the demonstration of a CCS system in Mattoon, Illinois. The author urges the use of CCS technology...

  • Future looks bright for US carbon capture project.  // New Scientist;3/21/2009, Vol. 201 Issue 2700, p4 

    The article reports on the U.S.-led FutureGen carbon capture project. It states that the project was supposed to demonstrate the capture and storage of carbon dioxide from a coal power plant, but the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) cancelled its commitment to the project in 2008 due to...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics