CMAJ criticized during annual meeting

Sullivan, Patrick
September 2001
CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;9/18/2001, Vol. 165 Issue 6, p808
Academic Journal
Reports on criticism of editorial decisions at this journal which were reported to the editor at a Canadian Medical Association meeting. Process which precedes the publication of an article; Suggestion by the editor that the letters to the editor section might be a desirable location for criticism; Other critiques.


Related Articles

  • 100 years and counting. Turnbull, Jeffrey // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;1/11/2011, Vol. 183 Issue 1, p16 

    The article focuses on the changes in the "Canadian Medical Association Journal" (CMAJ) from its debut in 1911 until the present. According to the author, the journal's 100 years existence has been a record keeper for medical profession and united small doctors across Canada. It mentions the...

  • CMAJ's century reflects a profession and a country. Gray, Charlotte // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;1/11/2011, Vol. 183 Issue 1, p17 

    The article focuses on the history of the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ). According to the author, CMAJ was initiated in 1911 as a merger of the Montreal Medical Journal and the Maritime Medical News. He mentions that CMAJ's aim was to be a medium in promoting Canadian medicine. He...

  • A big mistake.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);3/4/2006, Vol. 332 Issue 7540, p499 

    The author comments on the firing of high-profile editor, John Hoey, editor of the medical journal CMAJ. Hoey was dismissed following a long running dispute with the journal's owner, the Canadian Medical Association, about interference in editorial decisions. The story emerged gradually, since...

  • Consent to publish is a matter of trust. Fletcher, John; Kelsall, Diane // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;3/18/2014, Vol. 186 Issue 5, p323 

    The article discusses the rationale behind the journal's move to no longer require consent to publish scholarly articles and instead ask authors to give written affirmation that they have obtained consent to publish from the patient and that the consent was fully informed, voluntary and is in...

  • CMA honours 2 medical pioneers, administrator.  // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;09/15/97, Vol. 157 Issue 6, p633 

    Offers news briefs related to the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) as of September 1997. Dr. Robert Salter, the 1997 recipient of the F.N.G. Starr Award; Dr. A.M. `Max' House, the recipient of the CMA Medal of Service; Peter Fraser, the recipient of the Medal of Honour; Other honorees.

  • Canada's doctors vote to discontinue financial support for CMAJ. Kondro, Wayne; Vogel, Lauren // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;9/21/2010, Vol. 182 Issue 13, pE659 

    The article discusses the motion passed by the Canadian Medical Association (CMA) on discontinuing direct financial support for "Canadian Medical Association Journal" (CMAJ) during its 143rd annual meeting in Niagara Falls, Ontario. Dr. Shawn Whatley, who sponsored the motion, said that his aim...

  • THE NO.1 SECRET TO GETTING PUBLISHED. Alspach, Grif // Critical Care Nurse;Dec2004, Vol. 24 Issue 6, p8 

    Offers advice on selecting research topics to be published in nursing journals. Integration of nursing experiences into the topics; Motivations in writing; Purpose of nursing journals; Ways in determining topics that can be published.

  • December 2005: Editor’s remarks. Carrió, Ignasi // European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging;Dec2005, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p1351 

    The article focuses on the process of publishing submissions to the "European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging." It is the task of the editor and the editorial board to select from the number of submission what is best in field, and then bring it rapidly to the readership. After...

  • 'Ring out …'. Harding Rains, A. J. // Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine;Dec1994, Vol. 87 Issue 12, p723 

    The author introduces the last issue of the "Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine" before it changes its format and editor. The author welcomes the new editor and cites his ability and distinction in clinical and academic medicine and experience in matters of medical scientific journals. He...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics