TITLE

EPA rejects new Oregon Water Quality Standards

PUB. DATE
July 2010
SOURCE
Confederated Umatilla Journal;Jul2010, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p11
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the disapproval of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the New and Revised Human Heath Water Quality Criteria for Toxics of Oregon on June 1, 2010. It says that the condemnation is based on the Fish Consumption Rate used by the Oregon, which set out the number of pollutants discharged in the state's waterways. It adds that EPA reviewed the water quality standard of Oregon 90 days of its submission and decided to disapprove six years after its compliance.
ACCESSION #
52006510

 

Related Articles

  • Wastewater Regulation Priorities. Kreuzer, Heidi // Pollution Engineering;May2001, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p8 

    Previews how United States President George W. Bush and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Christine Whitman plan to handle water arsenic levels and other water pollution issues during their terms. Wastewater regulation; Water infrastructure; Total maximum daily loads; Sanitary sewer...

  • Environmental Groups File Suit Against EPA Over Lake Pollution Limits.  // Clean Water Report;3/18/2009, Vol. 47 Issue 6, p10 

    The article reports on the lawsuit filed by the Earthjustice against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) due to inadequate pollution limits for Lake Okeechobee and its tributaries in Florida. It states that the lawsuit is in response to EPA's 2008 increase of the allowable phosphorous...

  • New Rule to Impact Smaller Water Treatment Systems.  // WaterWorld;May2000, Vol. 16 Issue 5, p9 

    Reports on the United States Environmental Protection Agency's publication of a proposal to protect drinking water supplies from contamination by Cryptosporidium and other microbial pathogens. Application of the Surface Water Treatment Rule to all public water systems using surface or ground...

  • Changes proposed to water quality standards approval process.  // Pollution Engineering;Sep99, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p12 

    Focuses on the United States Environmental Protection Agency's announcement of proposed changes to the federal regulation specifying when new and revised state and tribal water quality standards become effective.

  • Proposed Rules: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;12/18/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 243, p74924 

    The article presents two proposed rules from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The first proposal is about the water quality criteria within the State of Florida's estuaries, coastal waters and South Florida inland flowing waters. The other one is about the water qualit ystandards for...

  • Effective Date for the Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Lakes and Flowing Waters. Jackson, Lisa P. // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;7/6/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 130, p39949 

    The article presents a final rule from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on the effective date of the Water Quality Standards for Florida's Lakes and Flowing Waters rule. It mentions that the EPA is finalizing an extension for the effective date of the standards. It notes that the...

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Valuation of Surface Water Quality Improvements. Griffiths, Charles; Klemick, Heather; Massey, Matt; Moore, Chris; Newbold, Steve; Simpson, David; Walsh, Patrick; Wheeler, William // Review of Environmental Economics & Policy;Jan2012, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p130 

    Since 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has used benefit-cost analysis to evaluate many of its surface water quality regulations. Early regulations were aimed at controlling conventional and toxic pollutants that were directly linked to highly visible water quality problems. More...

  • Why states, not EPA should set pollution standards. Schoenbrod, David // Regulation;1996, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p18 

    Explains why states, not the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), should set pollution standards in the United States. Rationales for federal mandates; EPA chain of command; Issue of accountability; Concept of the national class; Suggested EPA reforms.

  • EPA air quality standards pose economic threat. Hollings, Ernest F. // South Carolina Business Journal;Oct97, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p1 

    Looks at the potential cost of the Environmental Protection Agency's tightened air quality standards on businesses in South Carolina. Effect of restricting the flexibility of the state's industries; Translation into higher costs for consumers; Lack of conclusive evidence for benefits from...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics