TITLE

Understanding the Industrial Boiler MACT Rule

AUTHOR(S)
Wolf, Don
PUB. DATE
June 2010
SOURCE
Heating/Piping/Air Conditioning Engineering;Jun2010, Vol. 82 Issue 6, p30
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the new Industrial Boiler maximum-achievable control technology (MACT) Rule finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for industry groups, such as institutional and commercial boilers. It says that the rule establishes a work-practice standard, which requires an annual tuneup for each natural-gas-fired boiler. It adds that the health-based compliance alternatives that were a key part of compliance for many facilities were not included in the new rule.
ACCESSION #
51911213

 

Related Articles

  • New boiler regulations could cost economy $10B. Morris, Julian // Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;11/4/2011, p22 

    The author comments on the implementation of the Boiler MACT regulations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 2011.

  • Why states, not EPA should set pollution standards. Schoenbrod, David // Regulation;1996, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p18 

    Explains why states, not the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), should set pollution standards in the United States. Rationales for federal mandates; EPA chain of command; Issue of accountability; Concept of the national class; Suggested EPA reforms.

  • EPA air quality standards pose economic threat. Hollings, Ernest F. // South Carolina Business Journal;Oct97, Vol. 16 Issue 9, p1 

    Looks at the potential cost of the Environmental Protection Agency's tightened air quality standards on businesses in South Carolina. Effect of restricting the flexibility of the state's industries; Translation into higher costs for consumers; Lack of conclusive evidence for benefits from...

  • NCEIT to host local ISO 14000 satellite conference. Willis, Belinda // Business Press;3/8/96, Vol. 8 Issue 45, p5 

    Reports on a videoconference on implementation of the International Standard Organization (ISO) 14000 Environmental Management Standards in the United States on March 5, 1996. Focus on the ISO 14000 standards and their relationship to US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines.

  • EPA says costs outweigh benefits of new rules, but wants them anyway. Catanzaro, Michael // Human Events;06/20/97, Vol. 53 Issue 23, p4 

    Reports on US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Carol Browner's adherence to the standards devised by the EPA on two major classes of air pollutants despite high cost. Environmental analysts' estimate on the cost of the regulations; Criticisms against the environmental...

  • EPA loses Northeast battle.  // Automotive News;3/24/1997, Vol. 71 Issue 5705, p8 

    Reports on the ruling of an appeals court on the US Environmental Protection Agency's efforts to force 12 Northeastern States and Washington, D.C., to adopt California's clean-air standards.

  • State waiting for courts to sort through new air-quality rules. Lane, Amy // Crain's Detroit Business;03/26/2001, Vol. 17 Issue 13, p19 

    Reports on the dilemma faced by Michigan in implementing federal air standards for ozone and soot. Counties that are out of compliance according to an initial analysis conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency; Variables that make it difficult to assess the standards'...

  • EPA Wins Big on Clean Air Act Case. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;May2001, Vol. 11 Issue 114, p19 

    Focuses on the United States Supreme Court ruling which affirmed a precedent barring the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from considering costs in creating air quality standards and reversed a lower court decision on the Clean Air Act. Court findings on the agency's implementation...

  • Cleaner air vs. minority suffering. Ridenour, David A. // Human Events;11/21/97, Vol. 53 Issue 44, p14 

    Comments on the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposal to impose new air quality standards to reduce ozone emissions and particulate matter. Economic costs of the standard; Historical data challenging EPA's claims for issuing the proposed standards; Adverse effects of the proposed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics