TITLE

FDIC to Postpone Premium Boost Amid Uncertainty

AUTHOR(S)
Adler, Joe
PUB. DATE
June 2010
SOURCE
American Banker;6/23/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 96, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) announced it would delay a scheduled raise in the insurance premiums it charges banks. The FDIC said the postponement was due to an uncertain economic forecast for the U.S. and to await the finalization of banking and finance legislation in the U.S. Congress.
ACCESSION #
51632952

 

Related Articles

  • Premiums: Proper Pacing Makes a Difference. Yingling, Edward L. // Community Banker;Oct2008, Vol. 17 Issue 10, p10 

    The article reports on the decision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to issue its proposal for restoring the Deposit Insurance Fund to its required minimum of 1.15% of insured deposits and to its target designated reserve ratio of 1.25%. The effect the proposal has on a U.S. bank's...

  • Don't Expect Cuts in Deposit Insurance Premiums, Gruenberg Says. Adler, Joe // American Banker;3/14/2013, Vol. 178 Issue 40, p15 

    The article focuses on the remarks of Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s (FDIC's) Chairman Martin Gruenberg who attended the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) conference held in Las Vegas, Nevada on March 13, 2013. Gruenberg said the FDIC is not planning to lower banks' deposit...

  • FDIC Premiums Drop with Banks Shedding Risks. Adler, Joe // American Banker;4/ 9/2014, Vol. 179 Issue 54, p14 

    The article gives information from the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s (FDIC's) semiannual report on trends in the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF), noting that the FDIC released its projections on April 8, 2014. The article notes that the FDIC's premium income is expected to decline and that...

  • FDIC Releases September Enforcement Actions. Broughton, Kristin // American Banker;11/3/2014, Vol. 179 Issue 169, p19 

    The article offers an update of enforcement activities by the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) for September 2014. Topics discussed include the issuance of a consent order against anti-money-laundering procedures implemented by BancorpSouth Bank in Tupelo, Mississippi, and a consent...

  • More Evidence TAG Helps Only the Big Banks. Whalen, Christopher // American Banker;6/22/2012, Vol. 177 Issue F324, p8 

    The article argues funds from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) emergency program in the U.S. that were supposed to help small banks are ending up in large banks. The argument is based on JPMorgan Chase's chief executive officer Jamie Dimon's testimony at...

  • The Use of Market Information in Pricing Deposit Insurance. Thomson, James B. // Journal of Money, Credit & Banking (Ohio State University Press);Nov87, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p528 

    The article focuses on the use of market information in pricing deposit insurance in the U.S. The paper looks particularly at how the stock market's fair value estimate of deposit insurance could be influenced by uninsured depositors and what deposit guarantees would be like if there were no...

  • Stress Test Won't Raise Premiums in FDIC Plan. Adler, Joe // American Banker;5/9/2007, Vol. 172 Issue 89, p3 

    The article discusses a decision by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) not to increase premiums for large banks if they did poorly in economic stress tests. The FDIC was originally going to raise rates of banks who performed poorly, but decided to use several other factors including...

  • FDIC to Align Premiums Scheme with Basel Reform. Adler, Joe // American Banker;7/16/2014, Vol. 179 Issue 109, p11 

    The article reports that the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) proposed a change in its pricing of rates to banks of deposit insurance to conform with changes in bank capital requirements in the Basel III international banking regulations

  • FDIC Credit Distribution Plan Criticized as Unfair. Adler, Joe // American Banker;8/21/2006, Vol. 171 Issue 160, p4 

    This article reports on a $4.7 billion credit for the banking industry that was supposed to be a reward for supporting legislation to revamp the deposit insurance system after paying steep premiums a decade ago. However, in more than two dozen comment letters to the Federal Deposit Insurance...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics