TITLE

Can colorectal cancer mass-screening organization be evidence-based? Lessons from failures: the experimental and pilot phases of the Lazio program

AUTHOR(S)

DeFranco, Emily A.; Lian, Min; Muglia, Louis A.; Schootman, Mario

PUB. DATE

January 2008

SOURCE

BMC Public Health;2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p318

SOURCE TYPE

Academic Journal

DOC. TYPE

Article

ABSTRACT

Background: Screening programmes should be organized to translate theoretical efficacy into effectiveness. An evidence-based organizational model of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) should assure feasibility and high compliance. Methods: A multidisciplinary Working Group (WG), reviewed literature and guidelines to define evidence-based recommendations. The WG identified the need for further local studies: physicians' CRCS attitudes, the effect of test type and provider on compliance, and individual reasons for non-compliance. A survey of digestive endoscopy services was conducted. A feasibility study on a target population of 300.000 has begun. Results: Based on the results of population trials and on literature review the screening strategy adopted was Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) every two years for 50-74 year olds and, for positives, colonoscopy. The immunochemical test was chosen because it has 20% higher compliance than the Guaiac. GPs were chosen as the preferred provider also for higher compliance. Since we observed that distance is the major determinant of non-compliance, we choose GPs because they are the closest providers, both geographically and emotionally, to the public. The feasibility study showed several barriers: GP participation was low, there were administrative problems to involve GPs; opportunistic testing by the GPs; difficulties in access to Gastroenterology centres; difficulties in gathering colonoscopy results; little time given to screening activity by the gastroenterology centre. Conclusion: The feasibility study highlighted several limits of the model. Most of the barriers that emerged were consequences of organisational choices not supported by evidence. The principal limit was a lack of accountability by the participating centres.

ACCESSION #

51486690

 

Related Articles

• Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance. SHORT, MATTHEW W.; LAYTON, MILES C.; TEER, BETHANY N.; DOMAGALSKI, JASON E. // American Family Physician;1/15/2015, Vol. 91 Issue 2, p93 

  Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and women. The incidence and mortality rate of the disease have been declining over the past two decades because of early detection and treatment. Screening in persons at average risk should begin at 50 years of age; the U.S. Preventive...

• National Colon Cancer Screening Day Targets First-Time Patients.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;3/7/2012, Vol. 21, p1 

  The article announces that National Colon Cancer Screening Day will be held on March 8, 2012 in the U.S. It further informs that the first-time patients will undergo a colonoscopy on the same day as part of the Colorectal Cancer Awareness month. It mentions that colonoscopy helps in the early...

• Outcomes of colorectal cancer in the United States: no change in survival (1986–1997) Rabeneck, Linda; El-Serag, Hashem B.; Davila, Jessica A.; Sandler, Robert S. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Feb2003, Vol. 98 Issue 2, p471 

  : ObjectivesThe past decade has witnessed important advances in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and treatment. To assess the potential impact of these advances on CRC survival and incidence, we evaluated recent temporal trends in the United States.: MethodsUsing the nine population-based...

• Screening for colorectal cancer.  // Africa Health;Nov2014, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p49 

  The article focuses on the study which shows the effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in reducing the mortality of CRC.

• Hudson Valley Hospital offering virtual colonoscopy.  // Westchester County Business Journal;12/15/2003, Vol. 42 Issue 50, p18 

  Reports on the availability of virtual colonoscopy, a screening for the detection of colorectal cancer, at Hudson Valley Hospital Center in Cortlandt Manor, New York. Cause of cancer related deaths; Features of the virtual colonoscopy.

• Cost-Containment Redux: Time for Physicians to Engage. Kravitz, Richard // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;Sep2012, Vol. 27 Issue 9, p1093 

  An introduction is presented in which the author discusses various reports within the issue on topics including one on the survey to over 1,200 primary care providers concerning the efficacy of colonoscopy, one on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and one on the impact of delayed or absent...

• ATL>A population-based, community estimate of total colon examination: the impact on compliance with screening for colorectal cancer. Schoen, Robert E.; Weissfeld, Joel L.; Trauth, Jeanette M.; Ling, Bruce S.; Hayran, Mutlu // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Feb2002, Vol. 97 Issue 2, p446 

  OBJECTIVE:Colorectal cancer screening is underutilized. Total colon examination (TCE), such as with colonoscopy, can have a significant effect on the measured compliance with screening, as colonoscopy may be able to be performed as infrequently as once every 10 yr. In a population-based survey...

• Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.  // Biomedical Market Newsletter;3/21/2012, Vol. 21, p1 

  The article offers information a health survey conducted by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York researchers which revealed the impact of increased colonoscopic pressure on the quality of colon cancer screening.

• Comparison of the Yield and Miss Rate of Narrow Band Imaging and White Light Endoscopy in Patients Undergoing Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis. Pasha, Shabana F; Leighton, Jonathan A; Das, Ananya; Harrison, M Edwyn; Gurudu, Suryakanth R; Ramirez, Francisco C; Fleischer, David E; Sharma, Virender K // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Mar2012, Vol. 107 Issue 3, p363 

  OBJECTIVES:Colonoscopy has an appreciable miss rate for adenomas and colorectal cancer. The goal of advanced endoscopic imaging is to improve lesion detection. Compared with standard definition, high-definition (HD) colonoscopes have the advantage of increased field of visualization and higher...

Read the Article