Verifiability of diagnostic categories and work ability in the context of disability pension award: a survey on gatekeeping among general practitioners in Norway

Overland, Rein; Overland, Simon; Johansen, Kristian Nyborg; Mykletun, Arnstein
January 2008
BMC Public Health;2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p137
Academic Journal
Background: Disability benefits exist to redeem social and financial consequences of reduced work ability from medical conditions. Physicians are responsible for identifying the medical grounds for benefit claims. The aim of this study was to explore physicians' views on verifiability of medical conditions and related work ability in this context. Methods: Information on verifiability of diagnostic categories and work ability was obtained from a survey among a representative sample of general practitioners (GPs) in Norway (n = 500, 25.2% response rate). Verifiability was defined as to what extent the assessment is based on objective criteria versus on information from the patient. We enquired about the diagnostic categories used in official statistics on main disability benefit causes in Norway and elsewhere. Results: On a scale from 0 (low verifiability) to 5 (high verifiability), the mean level of verifiability across all diagnostic categories was 3.7 (SD = 0.42). Degree of verifiability varied much between diagnostic categories, and was low in e.g. unspecified rheumatism/myalgia and dorsopathies, and high in neoplasms and congenital malformations, deformation and chromosomal abnormalities. Verifiability of work ability was reported to be more problematic than that of diagnostic categories. The diagnostic categories rated as the least verifiable, are also the most common in disability pension awards. Conclusion: Verifiability of both diagnostic categories and work ability in disability assessments are reported to be moderate by GPs. We suggest that the low verifiability of diagnostic categories and related work ability assessments in the majority of disability pension awards is important in explaining why GPs find the gatekeeping-function problematic.


Related Articles

  • Patients' vote of confidence in GPs. Crump, Helen // Pulse;5/10/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 18, p3 

    The article reports on the survey conducted regarding the practice of general practitioners (GP) in Great Britain. A major survey of GP practices on 400,00 patients shows an increased satisfaction of the patient in the access and high ratings to overall care of GP. According to Dr. David Jenner,...

  • Digging deeper for good news. Meylan, Greg // New Zealand Doctor;11/17/2004, p5 

    Provides information on the Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey which compares the attitudes and experiences of patients in New Zealand, Great Britain and other countries in 2004. Percentage of New Zealanders and other nationalities who avoid medical check-ups because of the...

  • GP workload will rise with patient choice.  // Pulse;9/8/2003, Vol. 63 Issue 36, p6 

    Reports that the majority of general practitioners believed the government's drive to give patients more choice on how they are treated will increase their workload according to the survey in Great Britain.

  • How Safe Is Surgery for PAH Patients? Preston, Ioana // Advances in Pulmonary Hypertension;Spring2013, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p11 

    Summaries and commentaries from the section editors and invited reviewers present a clinical context for practitioners' application of the latest published research relevant to the care of patients with pulmonary hypertension. In this issue Ioana Preston, MD, discusses a recently published...

  • GP BUSINESS: Why 'choice' concept misses the point. Handysides, Stuart // GP: General Practitioner;1/26/2004, p35 

    Doctors well know that patients do not always make excellent choices. They help them pick up the pieces that result from some of their repeated poor choices. One of the most publicised developments in the DoH's document was that commuters will be able to register with general practitioners (GPs)...

  • Get better care from your doctor.  // Consumer Reports;Feb2007, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p32 

    This article presents the results of a survey of almost 40,000 patients regarding their doctor visits, as well as questions for doctors on their perspectives. Most patients were satisfied with their doctors and the care they received. Most doctors said that patients asked them about drugs they...

  • Undercover survey finds pharmacy advice unsafe. Praities, Nigel // Pulse;10/1/2008, Vol. 68 Issue 33, p11 

    The article focuses on the findings of undercover survey that the pharmacy advice is dangerous to patients in Great Britain. The survey shows that almost 44% of pharmacies failed to inform patients to consult first their general practitioner (GP) before buying drugs from the pharmacies. It cites...

  • Family practice patients' adherence to statin medications. Natarajan, Nandini; Putnam, R. Wayne; Yip, Alexandra M.; Frail, Dawn // Canadian Family Physician;Dec2007, Vol. 53 Issue 12, p2144 

    OBJECTIVE To measure family practice patients' adherence to statin medications and to identify factors associated with adherence to these medications. DESIGN Cross-sectional study using a mailed self-report survey sent to 400 patients. SETTING Two academic family practice clinics in Halifax, NS....

  • Information to cancer patients: a questionnaire survey in three different geographical areas in Italy. R. Bracci; E. Zanon; R. Cellerino; R. Gesuita; F. Puglisi; G. Aprile; V. Barbieri; D. Misuraca; S. Venuta; F. Carle; A. Piga // Supportive Care in Cancer;Aug2008, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p869 

    Abstract Goals of work  The way to inform cancer patients varies widely among different countries. In most Mediterranean countries, the traditional approach has been of partial disclosure of the truth. The intent of our work was to find if the attitude in Italy has changed in recent years...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics