TITLE

Cost-utility of a walking programme for moderately depressed, obese, or overweight elderly women in primary care: a randomised controlled trial

AUTHOR(S)
Gusi, Narcis; Reyes, Maria C.; Gonzalez-Guerrero, Jose L.; Herrera, Emilio; Garcia, Jose M.
PUB. DATE
January 2008
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2008, Vol. 8, p231
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: There is a considerable public health burden due to physical inactivity, because it is a major independent risk factor for several diseases (e.g., type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, moderate mood disorders neurotic diseases such as depression, etc.). This study assesses the cost utility of the adding a supervised walking programme to the standard "best primary care" for overweight, moderately obese, or moderately depressed elderly women. Methods: One-hundred six participants were randomly assigned to an interventional group (n = 55) or a control group (n = 51). The intervention consisted of an invitation, from a general practitioner, to participate in a 6-month walking-based, supervised exercise program with three 50-minute sessions per week. The main outcome measures were the healthcare costs from the Health System perspective and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using EuroQol (EQ-5D.) Results: Of the patients invited to participate in the program, 79% were successfully recruited, and 86% of the participants in the exercise group completed the programme. Over 6 months, the mean treatment cost per patient in the exercise group was €41 more than "best care". The mean incremental QALY of intervention was 0.132 (95% CI: 0.104-0.286). Each extra QALY gained by the exercise programme relative to best care cost €311 (95% CI, €143-€394). The cost effectiveness acceptability curves showed a 90% probability that the addition of the walking programme is the best strategy if the ceiling of inversion is €350/QALY. Conclusion: The invitation strategy and exercise programme resulted in a high rate of participation and is a feasible and cost-effective addition to best care. The programme is a cost-effective resource for helping patients to increase their physical activity, according to the recommendations of general practitioners. Moreover, the present study could help decision makers enhance the preventive role of primary care and optimize health care resources. Trial Registration: [ISRCTN98931797]
ACCESSION #
51485602

 

Related Articles

  • Design considerations in a clinical trial of a cognitive behavioural intervention for the management of low back pain in primary care: Back Skills Training Trial. Lamb, Sarah E.; Lall, Ranjit; Hansen, Zara; Withers, Emma J.; Griffiths, Frances E.; Szczepura, Ala; Barlow, Julie; Underwood, Martin R. // BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2007, Vol. 8, p14 

    Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a major public health problem. Risk factors for the development and persistence of LBP include physical and psychological factors. However, most research activity has focused on physical solutions including manipulation, exercise training and activity...

  • The Case for Cervical Cancer Screening. Ibrahim, Michel A. // American Journal of Public Health;Feb1978, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p114 

    The article evaluates the efficacy of screening for cervical cancer in the U.S. The method is widely accepted procedure of demonstrable benefit to that population which is able to bear the cost. Doctors or nurses perform the method in primary care settings with minimal inconvenience to women and...

  • Incentives in primary care and their impact on potentially avoidable hospital admissions. Fiorentini, Gianluca; Iezzi, Elisa; Bruni, Matteo Lippi; Ugolini, Cristina // European Journal of Health Economics;Aug2011, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p297 

    Financial incentives in primary care have been introduced with the purpose of improving appropriateness of care and containing demand. We usually observe pay-for-performance programs, but alternatives, such as pay-for-participation in improvement activities and pay-for-compliance with clinical...

  • Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. Dietrich, Allen J.; Oxman, Thomas E.; Williams Jr., John W.; Schulberg, Herbert C.; Bruce, Martha L.; Lee, Pamela W.; Barry, Sheila; Raue, Patrick J.; Lefever, Jean J.; Heo, Moonseong; Rost, Kathryn; Kroenke, Kurt; Gerrity, Martha; Nutting, Paul A. // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);9/11/2004, Vol. 329 Issue 7466, p602 

    Objective To test the effectiveness of an evidence based model for management of depression in primary care with support from quality improvement resources. Design Cluster randomised controlled trial. Setting Five healthcare organisations in the United States and 60 affiliated practices....

  • PHONZ members in PSAAP limbo. J. Y. // New Zealand Doctor;6/6/2007, p5 

    The article looks at the possibility that some of the low cost access practices of Primary Health Organizations in New Zealand (PHONZ) will leave the scheme after the final subsidies are rolled out in July 2007. According to PHONZ acting chair Keriana Booking, the rollout put the fees of the...

  • State-Funded Comprehensive Primary Medical Care Service Programs for Medically Underserved Populations: 1995 vs 2000. Wilensky, Sara; Rosenbaum, Sara; Hawkins, Dan; Mizeur, Heather // American Journal of Public Health;Feb2005, Vol. 95 Issue 2, p254 

    Objectives. We analyzed responses to the 2000 Comprehensive Primary Medical Care programs for Medically Underserved Populations Survey and compared them with the 1995 survey results to identify trends. Methods. Surveys were mailed to all primary care program offices. State primary care program...

  • Primary care support for tackling obesity: a qualitative study of the perceptions of obese patients. Brown, Ian; Thompson, Joanne; Tod, Angela; Jones, Georgina // British Journal of General Practice;Sep2006, Vol. 56 Issue 530, p666 

    Background Obesity has become a major public health issue and there is concern about the response of health services to patients who are obese. The perceptions of obese patients using primary care services have not been studied in depth, Aim To explore obese patients' experiences and perceptions...

  • Should treatment depend on BMI? Bostock, Nick // GP: General Practitioner;12/2/2005, p21 

    The article reports that suggestions that obese patients be denied referrals have divided physicians. Spiralling deficits across the NHS have left many primary care organisations (PCOs) desperate to cut referrals to secondary care to rein in costs. GPs understand that trusts' need to work within...

  • The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review. Dee, Anne; Kearns, Karen; O'Neill, Ciaran; Sharp, Linda; Staines, Anthony; O'Dwyer, Victoria; Fitzgerald, Sarah; Perry, Ivan J. // BMC Research Notes;2014, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p2 

    Background The rising prevalence of overweight and obesity places a financial burden on health services and on the wider economy. Health service and societal costs of overweight and obesity are typically estimated by top-down approaches which derive population attributable fractions for a range...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics