Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures

Zambon, Francesco; Fedeli, Ugo; Marchesan, Maria; Schievano, Elena; Ferro, Antonio; Spolaore, Paolo
January 2008
BMC Public Health;2008, Vol. 8, p233
Academic Journal
Background: The effects of seat belt laws and public education campaigns on seat belt use are assessed on the basis of observational or self-reported data on seat belt use. Previous studies focusing on front seat occupants have shown that self-reports indicate a greater seat belt usage than observational findings. Whether this over-reporting in self reports applies to rear seat belt usage, and to what extent, have yet to be investigated. We aimed to evaluate the over-reporting factor for rear seat passengers and whether this varies by gender and under different compulsory seat belt use conditions. Methods: The study was conducted in the Veneto Region, an area in the North-East of Italy with a population of 4.7 million. The prevalence of seat belt use among rear seat passengers was determined by means of a cross-sectional self-report survey and an observational study. Both investigations were performed in two time periods: in 2003, when rear seat belt use was not enforced by primary legislation, and in 2005, after rear seat belt use had become compulsory (June 2003). Overall, 8138 observations and 7902 interviews were recorded. Gender differences in the prevalence of rear seat belt use were examined using the chi-square test. The over-reporting factor, defined as the ratio of the self-reported to the observed prevalence of rear seat belt use, was calculated by gender before and after the rear seat belt legislation came into effect. Results: Among rear seat passengers, self-reported rates were always higher than the observational findings, with an overall over-reporting factor of 1.4. We registered no statistically significant changes over time in the over-reporting factor, nor any major differences between genders. Conclusion: Self-reported seat belt usage by rear passengers represents an efficient alternative to observational studies for tracking changes in actual behavior, although the reported figures need to be adjusted using an appropriate over-reporting factor in order to gain an idea of genuine seat belt use.


Related Articles

  • Where's a cop when you need one? Sorge, Marjorie // Automotive Industries;May97, Vol. 177 Issue 5, p11 

    Editorial. Argues the need for the seat belt usage as a primary enforcement law when looking at certain incidences, like driving with children standing in the back seat of the vehicle without seal belts on, and cabs with no seat belts. Significance of having seat belt usage as a primary...

  • Seat Belt requirements for kids in vehicles.  // Munday Courier (TX);3/15/2012, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p5 

    The article offers information on seat belt requirements for children in vehicles as ordered by the sheriff of Knox County, Texas.

  • Buckle up or get less.  // State Legislatures;Jul/Aug98, Vol. 24 Issue 7, p14 

    Reports on the decision of the Supreme Court of Colorado that lowers the amount of damages that will be awarded to motorists who do not use seat belt. Law passed by the state assembly on seat belt use.

  • New rule due on seat-belt fit. Gates, Max // Automotive News;8/1/1994, Vol. 68 Issue 5563, p2 

    Reports on federal safety officials' release of rules for improved seat-belt fit in the United States. Possible actions; Encouragement for more belt use; Installation of safety-belt anchorages to satisfy customer demands.

  • THE AIR BAG/SEAT BELT CONTROVERSY: HOW THE STATES VOTED. Kneuper, Robert; Yandle, Bruce // Eastern Economic Journal;Spring96, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p147 

    Examines a rare voting opportunity that came with automobiles' airbag/seatbelt struggle of the mid- to late-1980s. Theory of legislative votes; Presentation of empirical model; Benefits from lobbying for mandatory belt laws.

  • Big brother says belt up. Blake, Kevin // Consumers' Research Magazine;Apr97, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p38 

    Reports about the Maryland state legislature approval to make failure to wear a seatbelt be a primary offense. Findings on its effectivity as a primary offense in Maryland, Washington D.C. and North Carolina; Reactions of some critics regarding the issue.

  • Belt up in Oklahoma. Blake, Kevin // Consumers' Research Magazine;Aug97, Vol. 80 Issue 8, p38 

    Focuses on the seatbelt law passed by Oklahoma. Means and effectiveness of the laws; Seatbelt use rate.

  • Buckle up.  // Christian Science Monitor;4/25/97, Vol. 89 Issue 105, p20 

    Editorial. Discusses a legislation by American President Bill Clinton which requires persons to wear seatbelts. Statistics on the number of persons who do not wear seatbelts; Detailed information on the bill.

  • New York state seatbelt laws explained. Werner, Dave // Adirondack Daily Enterprise;7/3/2010, Vol. 117 Issue 156, pA5 

    The article discusses the provisions under the seatbelt laws in New York under Section 1229-c of the state Vehicle and Traffic Law.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics