Virginia Town Wins Big Telecom Case

Estrella, Joe
May 2001
Multichannel News;5/28/2001, Vol. 22 Issue 22, p3
Trade Publication
Reports the court ruling of District Court in favor of Bristol, Virginia in a case prohibiting localities from establishing telecommunication networks. Empowerment of the cities to install fiber-optic telecommunication networks; Implication of the district court decisions.


Related Articles

  • Court suspends attempt to merge telecom, media regulators.  // Latin America Telecom;Dec2015, Vol. 20 Issue 12, p1 

    The article reports on the suspension by an administrative judge of the Argentine government's plan to merge the communications and telecommunications regulators in 2015.

  • Texas Can't Tax Interstate and International Long Distance Calls Originating in the State to Fund Intrastate Universal Telecommunication Services. Harris, Stephen; Perry, Gregg // Venulex Legal Summaries;2004 Q3, p1 

    The article discusses the decision made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that determined that the state of Texas cannot charge tax for interstate and international long-distance calls that originate in the state to fund telephone subsidies for its poor, deaf and rural...

  • Lloyd Jones and others v T-Mobile (UK) Ltd. Denyer-Green, Barry // EG: Estates Gazette;12/6/2003, Issue 349, p130 

    Discusses the case Lloyd Jones and others v. T-Mobile (UK) Ltd., which involves the Telecommunications Act 1984. Comments on the court decision; Grounds of appeal; Details of the respondents' notice of Mr. Hall Taylor.

  • California Cities Can't Reject Cell Towers for Their Looks. Lawlor, James // Planning;Apr2006, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p51 

    The article discusses the ruling of the between Sprint PCS and the City of La Canada, California regarding the city's disapproval on the permit of the company to install cellular towers in the city. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the company and held that the rejection of...

  • Antenna slighting. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;1/26/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p10 

    Cites the ruling of the U.S. Ninth Circuit of Appeals in San Francisco, California that those who violate the telecommunication act's antenna-siting provision can be liable for damages under a 1983 law. Details of the lawsuit filed by ham radio owner Mark Abrams; Basis of the Ninth Circuit for...

  • In re NOS Communications. Anderson, Jonathan B. // Urban Lawyer;Fall2007, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p1050 

    The article focuses on the case of NOS Communications Inc. and Affinity Network vs. their consumers in the U.S. The plaintiffs argued that the charges, practices and regulations in defendants tariffs were unjust and unreasonable because the terms were not clear and do not explicitly explained...

  • Appeals court upholds FCC.  // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);7/4/2008, Vol. 55 Issue 33, p12A 

    The article reports that the federal appeals court of New York upheld the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC's) authority to set rules meant for new cable television (TV) competitors to gain local franchises. It notes that local governments throughout the country filed legal challenges to...

  • Calif. court rules arbitration can't stop class-actions. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;7/4/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 27, p6 

    Presents updates on the cellular telephone services industry as of July 4, 2005. Decision of the California Supreme Court on arbitration agreements between companies and customers; Conduct of a review of state telecommunication regulations by the California Public Utilities Commission.

  • Employer Use of Employee's Website Does Not Violate Wiretap Act.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q3, p1 

    The article focuses on the judgment by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the case involving a pilot of Hawaiian Airlines and the management, stating that unauthorized viewing of Web site is not a violation of the federal Wiretap Act. A Hawaiian Airlines manager asked the...

  • Wronged tower owners cannot collect legal fees, Supreme Court rules 9-0. Weaver, Heather Forsgren; Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;3/28/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 13, p15 

    Reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the liability of SMR operator Mark Abrams for attorney's fees and other damages even if he wins a tower-siting case. Impact of liability for attorney's fees on the context of Telecommunication Act of 1996; Reason behind the decision...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics