TITLE

Air pollution in Boston bars before and after a smoking ban

AUTHOR(S)
Repace, James L.; Hyde, James N.; Brugge, Doug
PUB. DATE
January 2006
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2006, Vol. 6, p266
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: We quantified the air quality benefits of a smoke-free workplace law in Boston Massachusetts, U.S.A., by measuring air pollution from secondhand smoke (SHS) in 7 pubs before and after the law, comparing actual ventilation practices to engineering society (ASHRAE) recommendations, and assessing SHS levels using health and comfort indices. Methods: We performed real-time measurements of respirable particle (RSP) air pollution and particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAH), in 7 pubs and outdoors in a model-based design yielding air exchange rates for RSP removal. We also assessed ventilation rates from carbon dioxide concentrations. We compared RSP air pollution to the federal Air Quality Index (AQI) and the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) to assess health risks, and assessed odor and irritation levels using published SHS-RSP thresholds. Results: Pre-smoking-ban RSP levels in 6 pubs (one pub with a non-SHS air quality problem was excluded) averaged 179 μg/m³, 23 times higher than post-ban levels, which averaged 7.7 μg/m³, exceeding the NAAQS for fine particle pollution (PM2.5) by nearly 4-fold. Pre-smoking ban levels of fine particle air pollution in all 7 of the pubs were in the Unhealthy to Hazardous range of the AQI. In the same 6 pubs, pre-ban indoor carcinogenic PPAH averaged 61.7 ng/m³, nearly 10 times higher than post-ban levels of 6.32 ng/m³. Post-ban particulate air pollution levels were in the Good AQI range, except for 1 venue with a defective gas-fired deep-fat fryer, while post-ban carcinogen levels in all 7 pubs were lower than outdoors. Conclusion: During smoking, although pub ventilation rates per occupant were within ASHRAE design parameters for the control of carbon dioxide levels for the number of occupants present, they failed to control SHS carcinogens or RSP. Nonsmokers' SHS odor and irritation sensory thresholds were massively exceeded. Post-ban air pollution measurements showed 90% to 95% reductions in PPAH and RSP respectively, differing little from outdoor concentrations. Ventilation failed to control SHS, leading to increased risk of the diseases of air pollution for nonsmoking workers and patrons. Boston's smoking ban eliminated this risk.
ACCESSION #
51457878

 

Related Articles

  • Eliminating Smoking in Bars, Restaurants, and Gaming Clubs in California: BREATH, The California Smoke-Free Bar Program. Kiser, Dian; Boschert, Theresa // Journal of Public Health Policy;2001, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p81 

    On January 1, 1998, California became the first state in the country to prohibit indoor smoking in nightspots, bars, bar/restaurant combinations, bingo parlors, cardrooms, and casinos on a statewide basis. This paper describes the activities which achieved this result, based on a program with...

  • Not Out There: Why Outdoor Smoking Bans Finally Pass Constitutional Muster. Schueler, Collin // Quinnipiac Health Law Journal;2011/2012, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p127 

    The article discusses the implications of constitutional laws regarding the banning of smoking outdoors. It also discusses about the public health effects of indoor and outdoor smoking. It states that second hand smoking results in serious health risks including low birth weight of unborn...

  • Strength of smoke-free air laws and indoor air quality. Kiyoung Lee; Hahn, Ellen J.; Robertson, Heather E.; Seongjik Lee; Vogel, Suzann L.; Travers, Mark J. // Nicotine & Tobacco Research;Apr2009, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p381 

    Introduction:: Smoke-free air laws have been implemented in many Kentucky communities to protect the public from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke exposure. The impact of different strengths of smoke-free air laws on indoor air quality was assessed.

  • Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA). Chriqui, J. F.; Frosh, M.; Brownson, R. C.; Shelton, D. M.; Sciandra, R. C.; Hobart, R.; Fisher, P. H.; Arculli, Rel; Alciati, M. H. // Tobacco Control;Mar2002, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p26 

    Objective: To develop and implement a system for rating state clean indoor air Jaws. Design: The public health interest of state clean indoor air laws is to limit non-smoker exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Current estimates of health risks and methods available for con- trolling...

  • On the Record. Gooch, Heather // Pest Control;Mar2004, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p5 

    Editorial. Comments on the enactment of the Clean Air Indoor Act, which bans smoking in all public areas in New York. Application of the ban to vehicles registered in the state while being driven in the state; Benefits of the ban; Resolution to kick the habit of smoking.

  • Breath of fresh air. Geens, Andrew // Nursing Standard;1/23/2008, Vol. 22 Issue 20, p22 

    Although smoking was banned in public places last July, there are exemptions and ventilation is the key to controlling environmental tobacco smoke.

  • Illinois Smoke Free Act 2007: A Case Study Analysis of Adoption and Implementation. Hays, Scott P.; Mulhall, Peter F. // Health Education Monograph Series;2010, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p5 

    No abstract available.

  • No Butts About It: Public Smoking Ends in Vermont. Carney, Jan K.; Hamrell, Marjorie C.; Wargo, William E. // American Journal of Public Health;May97, Vol. 87 Issue 5, p860 

    The article reports on the ban against public smoking in Vermont. Laws banning smoking in public places are important to minimize exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. They strengthen changing societal norms around smoking. The Vermont Legislature passed the Vermont Clean Indoor Air Act in...

  • UK Smoke-Free Legislation: Changes in PM2.5 Concentrations in Bars in Scotland, England, and Wales. Semple, Sean; van Tongeren, Martie; Galea, Karen S.; MacCalman, Laura; Gee, Ivan; Parry, Odette; Naji, Audrey; Ayres, Jon G. // Annals of Occupational Hygiene;Apr2010, Vol. 54 Issue 3, p272 

    Objective: Evaluate the effect of smoke-free legislation on fine particulate [particulate matter <2.5 μm in diameter (PM2.5)] air pollution levels in bars in Scotland, England, and Wales.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics