TITLE

Are Sale Signs Less Effective When More Products Have Them?

AUTHOR(S)
Anderson, Eric T.; Simester, Duncan I.
PUB. DATE
March 2001
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Spring2001, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p121
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
We analyze data from a variety of sources, including historical data from a women's clothing catalog, a field study in that catalog, survey responses to catalog stimuli, and grocery store data for frozen juice, toothpaste, and tuna. The analysis yields three conclusions. First, sale signs are less effective at increasing demand when more items have them. Second, total category sales are maximized when some but not all products have sale signs. Third, placing a sale sign on a product reduces the perceived likelihood that the product will be available the perceived likelihood that the product will be available at a lower price in the future, but the effect is smaller when more products have sale signs. By ruling out alternative hypotheses, the findings suggest that moderation of the sale sign effect is in part due to reduced credibility when they are used on more products. The credibility argument is motivated in part by a recent paper that presented an equilibrium model predicting that customers who lack knowledge of market prices rely on point-of-purchase sale signs to help evaluate posted prices (Anderson and Simester 1998). The model predicts that sale signs increase demand but that the increase is smaller when more products have them. This moderating effect regulates how many sale signs stores use and makes customer reliance on these cues an equilibrium strategy. To evaluate whether the number of sale signs moderates their effectiveness we compare demand for items with sale signs when varying the number of sale signs on other products. For this comparison we use two datasets describing demand for products in a women's clothing catalog. The first dataset describes customer orders for the same set of items across three sequential issues of the catalog. The second dataset is a field test conducted by mailing different versions of the catalog to randomly selected customer samples. Reassuringly, although the datasets do not share the same limitations, the finding are consistent and indicate that sale signs are less effective when more products have them. In addition to the credibility explanation there are at least two alternative explanations for this result. First, using a sale sign to make a product more attractive may lead to substitution of demand from other sale items within a store, and so demand may vary even if there is no change in the credibility of the sale signs. To discriminate between the substitution and credibility explanations, we evaluate whether total category demand is maximized when some but not all products in the category have sale signs. The credibility explanation implies that adding another sale sign will eventually decrease total category sales when many items already have sale signs. In contrast, if adding a sale sign to an item leads solely to substitution from other products within (or outside) the category we will not observe a decrease in total category demand. We test the total category sales prediction using grocery store scan data describing total category demand for frozen juice, toothpaste, and canned tuna. The findings reveal that in all three categories there is a significant reduction in aggregate demand. A second alternative explanation is that sale signs focus customer attention on products with these cues. Distinguishing between the attention and credibility explanations is a difficult task. They both imply that sale signs deliver less information when there are too many sale signs. The credibility argument predicts that this occurs because the signs are noticed but not believed. The attention explanation predicts that the signs are less likely to be noticed when attention is diluted by a large number of sale signs. To discriminate between the credibility explanation and this attention effect we use survey measures to evaluate a third hypothesis. This hypothesis predicts both that placing a sale sign on a product reduces the perceived likelihood that the product will be available at a lower price in the next period, and that this effect is smaller when more items have them. In an attempt to control for the attention effect we focus subjects' attention on a set of focal items. Under these conditions it is unlikely that subjects overlook sale signs on these items. More important, the likelihood of overlooking sale signs on the focal items is unlikely to depend on how many other items also have sale signs. The results confirm both that the presence of a sale sign reduced subjects' expectations that an item would be available at a lower price in the future and that this effect is smaller when more items have sale signs.
ACCESSION #
5144845

 

Related Articles

  • Just What is a 'Dollar's Worth'? Consumer Reactions to Price Discounts vs. Extra Product Promotions. Diamond, William D. // Journal of Retailing;Fall92, Vol. 68 Issue 3, p254 

    How much free extra product is equivalent to a 50 cent discount? Two studies examined how shoppers equate different types of promotions. First, 20 grocery shoppers determined indifference points between discounts and "free extra product" promotions. The "nominal values" of promotions, rather...

  • Some Insights into Reasonable Grocery Shopping Strategies. Carman, James M. // Journal of Marketing;Oct69, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p69 

    Housewives are often urged to do more "shopping around" before buying frequently purchased packaged goods. They are also encouraged to shop for deals and specials, and to buy store brands if they are interested in low prices. This research report on the benefits of shopping indicates whether...

  • SHOPPER Watch.  // Checkout;Oct2014, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p63 

    The article focuses on the October 2014 edition of the "ShopperWatch" which analyzes the effectiveness of promotions and consumers' behavior in context of "special" offers. Topics discussed include decline in number of survey respondents stating that there are right number of special offers,...

  • THE EFFECTS OF PRIOR BELIEFS ON PATTERNS OF INFORMATION SEARCH AND EVALUATION. Grimm, Pamela E.; Agrawal, Jagdish // AMA Winter Educators' Conference Proceedings;1989, p271 

    Examines the effect of prior beliefs on patterns of information search and evaluation of consumers preferences. Context of price quality relationships for three different goods; Implication of prior beliefs hypothesis on information collected and data samples; Effect of prior beliefs on...

  • Taking a peek into the national shopping cart. Dolliver, Mark // Adweek Eastern Edition;11/24/1997, Vol. 38 Issue 47, p16 

    Presents the results of a survey on the factors governing American consumers' choices as grocery shoppers conducted by Mark Clements Research. Factors influencing parents in their food buys for their children; Influence of advertising on the purchasing of foods.

  • More meatless meals, please. Krizmanic, Judy // Vegetarian Times;Nov93, Issue 195, p20 

    Reveals the results of a survey on consumer's decreasing preference for meat products. Practice of vegetarian behavior; Percentage of consumers who are `vegetarian aware'; Consumers' quest for low-fat food; Trend toward eating less meat and smaller portions.

  • Automated Groceries. Emerson, Gloria // Management Review;Dec67, Vol. 56 Issue 12, p51 

    Discusses the first computerized grocery store in Paris, France. Amount of time needed to choose and pay for 14 items; Drawbacks of a computerized grocery store; Allies of computerized grocery shopping.

  • Supermarkets up; cash & carries down. Ryan, Frances // Caribbean Business;11/27/1997, Vol. 25 Issue 47, p28 

    Reports that a 1997 `Consumer X-Ray' survey in Puerto Rico has revealed that supermarket chains have remained the Number One choice of families for grocery shopping, while cash and carry operations have diminished in popularity. Highlights of the survey; Comments from Ivan Santos from the...

  • Public Policy and Shopping Effectiveness: The Case of Item-Price Removal. Mills, Michael K.; Harris, Brian F. // Journal of Public Policy & Marketing;1983, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p70 

    The removal of item prices in scanner equipped grocery stores is an important public policy issue, as it relates to the ability of consumers to engage in effective shopping in the face of decreased price information. This study analyzed the possible role of public policy in this area by...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics