TITLE

Reward Programs and Tacit Collusion

AUTHOR(S)
Byung-Do Kim; Mengze Shi; Srinivasan, Kannan
PUB. DATE
March 2001
SOURCE
Marketing Science;Spring2001, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p99
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reward programs, a promotional tool to develop customer loyalty, offer incentives to consumers on the basis of cumulative purchases of a given product or service form a firm. Reward programs have become increasingly common in many industries. The best-known examples include frequent-flier programs offered by airlines, frequent-guest programs offered by hotels, and frequent-shopper programs offered by supermarkets. Despite the widespread business practice of reward programs, research efforts on reward programs, particularly in marketing, have been scarce. Our paper takes an important step towards understanding the design of reward programs and its implications on pricing strategies. We study a market that consists of two segments: heavy-and light-user segments. The key distinction between the two segments is that the heavy-user segment purchases in each period and thus is a candidate for the reward programs. In contrast, the light-user segment exits the market after one purchase and is not in a position to exploit reward programs. An important feature of our model is that we allow for different price sensitivity between heavy-user and light-user segments. Out model closely examines the type of rewards. A reward worth a dollar to the consumer might have different cost implications for the offering firm, depending on the type of reward. For example, cash rewards have higher unit reward cost (inefficient reward) for the firm than a free product of the firm, such as an airline ticket or ling-distance minutes (efficient reward). Specifically, we examine an interesting puzzle observed in the marketplace. Several firms offer a cash reward or a product not made by the firm, such as jackets, electronic items, etc. these firms could offer their own product as rewards and significantly lower their cost. We examine whether there is any reason for such a seemingly suboptimal practice. Our analysis shows that reward programs weaken price competition. By offering the incentives for repeat purchases, reward programs increase a firm's cost to attract competing firms' current customers. Because firms gain less from undercutting their prices, equilibrium prices go up. Moreover, as consumers become unwilling to switch because of potential rewards, the firm with a larger market share in the heavy-user segment charges higher prices. Therefore, a low price in the first period, which leads to a larger market share in the heavy-user segment, will always be followed by a high price in the second period. In our model, consumers are rational and can correctly anticipate firms' incentive to offer lower prices initially to enroll them into the reward programs. Our paper offers an explanation as to why the type and amount of reward may vary across that programs. Our paper offers an explanation as to why the type and amount of reward may vary across the programs. We identify two determining factors for the selection of rewards: size and relative price sensitivity of the heavy-user segment. We find that in a market with a small heavy-user segment. We find that in a market with a small heavy-user segment that is also much more price sensitive than the light-user segment, it is optimal for firms to offer the most inefficient rewards. The intuition is based on the firms' incentive to exploit the price-insensitive light-user segment. By offering inefficient rewards, firms are able to commit to weaker competition and, therefore, higher prices. When the heavy-user segment is large or not very price sensitive, when compared to the light-user segment, competing firms should adopt the most efficient rewards to maximize their profit. This may well be the case in a number of real-world situations in which efficient rewards are quite prevalent. We also find that optimal reward amount has a negative relationship with unit reward cost. Because both firms use rewards to attract the heavy users, they tend to offer more when they adopt the more efficient rewards. Finally, our paper identifies the relationship between market characteristics and the impact of reward programs on firms' profits and consumes' benefits. We find that firm gain from the adoption of reward programs as long as light users are not too price sensitive. When light users are very price sensitive, firms engage in intense price competition, thus benefiting little form the loyalty of heavy users created through rewards. Because reward programs increase market prices, light users, who do not get the reward, earn strictly lower benefit. In contrast, heavy users often stand to gain more from the reward program. In most cases, firms and the heavy users are better off at the expense of light users.
ACCESSION #
5144837

 

Related Articles

  • How To DIY ... Loyalty Programs. Montalvo, Kristin V. // Gourmet Retailer;Feb2009, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p21 

    The article focuses on loyalty programs for customers, which is stated to be a great way to build sales. The author states that retailers need to build loyalty based on intrinsic qualities before they can expect a loyalty program to do any good. It is stated that the key to a successful loyalty...

  • Knowing what is your customor's cup of tea. Hemsley, Steve // Marketing Week;5/12/2011, Vol. 34 Issue 19, p41 

    The article discusses the report published by Forrester Research Inc. which indicates the underperformance of loyalty schemes of marketers in Great Britain. The study suggests that loyalty programmes should contain data on consumer preferences and should be the core to a brand strategy for it to...

  • Brand Loyalty. Leiser, Michael // Fortune;9/29/2003, Vol. 148 Issue 6, p31 

    Presents a letter to the editor of "FORTUNE' magazine in response to its article on consumer-product companies and brand loyalty.

  • Private Label Grows Up. Barson, Donna C. // Global Cosmetic Industry;Feb2008, Vol. 176 Issue 2, p35 

    The article discusses the impact of private label brand development in the Market. It cites that private label is, cost effective and affordable to the consumers. Savvy marketers view private labels as distinct threat to sales, shelf positioning and customers product preferences. The basic...

  • Loyalty is cheap, says survey.  // In-Store;Nov2007, p7 

    The article presents the results of a survey on customer loyalty conducted by TNS for software group Cognos. The survey showed that 48% of consumers will discard their loyalty to a brand if a competitor is running effective promotion. Cognos global retail industry director Patricia Vekich...

  • Gifted marketers find pork pies are no real incentive.  // Marketing (00253650);9/11/2003, p44 

    The article focuses on consumers' preferences for promotional gifts offered by several business enterprises for growing their product sales, based on a survey conducted by the National Incentive Show. Apart from the findings that free product samples are the most influential promotions, followed...

  • Targeting the affluent young drinker.  // Campaign;1/27/2006, Issue 4, p14 

    The article focuses on the strategies of sales promotion of Hennessy Fine de Cognac, an alcohol brand. Increasing trial and frequency of consumption of Hennessy Fine de Cognac was not an easy task. Hennessy has traditionally eschewed major above-the-line campaigns. The campaign objectives were...

  • The critical discount factor as a measure for cartel stability? Bruttel, Lisa // Journal of Economics;Feb2009, Vol. 96 Issue 2, p113 

    This paper considers the stability of tacit collusion in price setting duopolies with repeated interaction. The minimum discount factor above which tacit collusion can be sustained in a subgame perfect equilibrium is called the critical discount factor δ*. In addition, δ* is often used as...

  • Asda open door policy gives consumers a powerful voice. Baker, Rosie // Marketing Week;10/8/2009, Vol. 32 Issue 41, p11 

    The article reports on the launch of three marketing initiatives by supermarket chain Asda which aim to put its customers at the heart of its decision-making and as part of its democratic consumerism strategy and open-door policy. These initiatives are Chosen by You, Aisle Spy and Bright Ideas....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics