TITLE

Coverage for Prescription Contraceptives

AUTHOR(S)
Hatch, D. Diane
PUB. DATE
September 2001
SOURCE
Workforce (10928332);Sep2001, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p88
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the lawsuit filed by employee, Jennifer Erickson against Bartell Drug Company in the United States. Prescription drugs included in the benefit plans of Bartell; Refusal of Bartell to provide benefits for contraceptives; Violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
ACCESSION #
5142817

 

Related Articles

  • ERICKSON v. BARTELL DRUG COMPANY: REQUIRING COVERAGE OF PRESCRIPTION CONTRACEPTIVES. Szalai, Michelle // St. John's Law Review;Spring2002, Vol. 76 Issue 2, p423 

    Examines the case Erickson versus Bartell Drug Co. regarding prescription contraceptives coverage under the company's Prescription Benefit Plan for non-union employees in the U.S. Background on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Details on the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978; Facts...

  • Paying for The Pill. Bryant, Adam // Newsweek;6/25/2001, Vol. 137 Issue 26, p38 

    Focuses on a United States federal ruling that Bartell Drug chain had violated Pregnancy Discrimination Act by covering basic health needs of male employees while requiring women to pay for birth control. Case of Jennifer Erickson, an employee who complained about discrimination in benefits;...

  • Paying for The Pill. Bryant, Adam // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);6/25/2001 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 137 Issue 26, p38 

    Focuses on a United States federal ruling that Bartell Drug chain had violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act by covering basic health needs of male employees while requiring women to pay for birth control. Case of Jennifer Erickson, an employee who complained about discrimination in...

  • Paying for The Pill. Bryant, Adam // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);6/25/2001 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 137 Issue 26, p28 

    Focuses on a United States federal ruling that Bartell Drug chain had violated Pregnancy Discrimination Act by covering basic health needs of male employees while requiring women to pay for birth control. Case of Jennifer Erickson, an employee who complained about discrimination in benefits;...

  • Federal ruling revives contraceptive coverage debate. Blassingame, Kelley M. // Employee Benefit News;Aug2001, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p17 

    Reports that the United States federal court's ruling on the discrimination case of Bartell Drugs had a ripple effect on several contraceptive coverage debates. Efforts of female advocates to increase the number of health plans covering contraceptives; Debate on the use of necessity and...

  • Oldest U.S. drug chain is nestled into Seattle. Symons, Allene // Drug Store News;4/24/2000, Vol. 22 Issue 6, p156 

    Provides information on the drugstore Bartell Drug Co. in Seattle, Washington and its economic performance for the year 1999. Number of drug chains the company had opened; Initiative of the company in expanding its prototype; Focus of the company's marketing campaigns.

  • Travel clinics, immunizations take flight at Bartell Drugs. DeArment, Alaric // Drug Store News;1/10/2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p27 

    The article presents a brief profile of Bartell Drugs in Seattle, Washington and offers information on its travel clinics.

  • Bartell dedicates new store to employee.  // Drug Store News;5/19/2003, Vol. 25 Issue 7, p4 

    Reports on the plan of Bartell Drugs Co. to open its drugstore in Edmonds, Washington.

  • Bartell opens 24-hour store.  // Drug Store News;4/3/95, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p33 

    Reports on the opening of Bartell Drug Co.'s first 24-hour drug store.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics