Endocrine Disruptors: Test Orders Abound

Bergeson, Lynn L.
June 2010
Pollution Engineering;Jun2010, Vol. 42 Issue 5, p15
Trade Publication
The article discusses the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). It says that the EDSP allows the screening of chemicals that are included in the list of EPA. It states that EDSP involves two-tier testing approach. However, there are controversy on probative and scientific value of the Tier 1 screening. It adds that industry stakeholders are concerned on the implications of Tier 1 screening on their chemicals.


Related Articles

  • THINK TANKUS finally begins endocrinedisruptor screening scheme.  // ICIS Chemical Business;6/25/2007, Vol. 2 Issue 72, p53 

    The article focuses on the initiation of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the U.S. in 2008. It will screen substances such as acetone and toluene for their potential to disrupt human hormones. However, it obtained accusations from the...

  • SAFE FOR HUMANS? BERGESON, LYNN B. // Manufacturing Today;Summer2010, p6 

    The article focuses on the challenges facing businesses following the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) launch of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) which aims to determine whether substances have hormonal effects on consumers. One of the challenges posed by the program...

  • Pesticide Makers Challenge EPA's Approach to Endocrine Screening. Bryner, Michelle // Chemical Week;7/28/2008, Vol. 170 Issue 23, p28 

    The article reports that CropLife America has filed a petition with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requesting further examination and explanation of EPA's risk assessment for testing suspected endocrine disrupting substances, which is set for implementation on August 31, 2008....

  • Medical waste could face federal emission limits. Harrigan, Kate // Pollution Engineering;Sep99, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p12 

    Reveals that hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators located in states that have not submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency plans would be subject to a federal plan to implement emissions guidelines.

  • EPA Adds Bathroom Faucets To WaterSense Program.  // Supply House Times;Mar2007, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p18 

    The article reports on the additional guidelines released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regarding the flow rate of the bathroom sink faucet of its WaterSense program. The guideline emphasizes that flow rate of faucet shall not exceed 1.5 gallons per minute at a pressure of 60...

  • Taking care with TRI reporting. Fairley, Peter // Chemical Week;10/9/1996, Vol. 158 Issue 38, p5 

    Opinion. Comments on the US Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) initiation of the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for the addition, delisting and redefinition of chemicals. Impact of TRI on the chemical industry's efforts in reducing releases and transfers of toxic chemicals; Chemical...

  • Legal Lookout. Bergeson, Esq., Lynn L. // Pollution Engineering;Jul2000, Vol. 32 Issue 7, p27 

    Focuses on the United States Environmental Protection Agency's proposed framework for its Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP). Availability of the straw proposal on the Internet; Selection of candidate chemicals; Proposed VCCEP test battery. INSET: VCCEP: The Impact On You.

  • Wetland rules leave high and dry. Wagner, David // Insight on the News;05/19/97, Vol. 13 Issue 18, p44 

    Discusses how environmental wetlands regulations are tightening the noose around landowners in the United States, according to Republican critics of the US Environmental Protection Agency. Change in the way the US Army Corps of Engineers' issue wetland permit; Need to prioritize wetlands by...

  • EPA reinstates one-hour ozone standard. Harrigan // Pollution Engineering;Dec99, Vol. 31 Issue 13, p12 

    Announces a proposal from the United States Environmental Protection Agency to reinstate its one-hour standard for ground-level ozone in almost 3000 US counties where the standard has been revoked since 1998. Response to a decision by the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics