TITLE

Effects of Rating Format on Goal-Setting Dimensions: A Field Experiment

AUTHOR(S)
Tziner, Aharon; Kopelman, Richard
PUB. DATE
May 1988
SOURCE
Journal of Applied Psychology;May88, Vol. 73 Issue 2, p323
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
A total of 10 managers and their 62 subordinates participated in a field experiment that examined the effects of performance appraisal feedback deriving from two rating formats�behavioral observation scales (BOS) and graphic rating scales (GRS)�on three goal-setting dimensions. Multivariate analyses of variance and a priori t tests revealed, as hypothesized, that the BOS format yielded significantly higher levels of goal clarity, goal acceptance, and goal commitment, the three goal-setting dimensions. Results are discussed in terms of systemic characteristics, that is, a "built-in" focus on specific behaviors, rather than a translation of generic performance dimensions into specific work behaviors.
ACCESSION #
5111755

Tags: FEEDBACK (Psychology);  FIELD experiments;  EXECUTIVES;  EMPLOYEES;  EMPLOYEES -- Rating of;  PERSONNEL management;  JOB evaluation;  MULTIVARIATE analysis;  JOB performance

 

Related Articles

  • Seek Feedback. Lenehan, Pamela F. // Sales & Service Excellence;Nov2006, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p4 

    This article talks about seeking useful feedback to improve one's work and performance. According to the author, many managers are not good at articulating what their employees could do to improve their performance, so a person needs to ask subtle questions and keep the conversation casual to...

  • The Effect of Giving Performance Feedback on Memory-Based Performance Ratings. Larson Jr., James R.; Skolnik, Yitzchok // Academy of Management Proceedings (00650668);1982, p186 

    Two laboratory experiments tested the hypothesis that giving performance feedback can significantly influence one's subsequent memory-based judgments about the performance of the person receiving that feedback. The results provide partial support for this hypothesis. The cognitive mechanisms...

  • USING MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTES TO ASSESS SOURCES OF PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK. Herold, David M.; Letherwood, Marya L.; Liden, Robert C. // Academy of Management Journal;Dec1987, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p826 

    The article provides information on a study which aimed to examine whether individuals differentiate between feedback sources on the basis of the perceived usefulness and reliability of the information they provide. A discussion is presented about the importance of using multiple attributes and...

  • How to manage high and low performers. Martin, Marty // Communication Briefings;Nov2012, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p6 

    The article discusses how to manage employee performance, and how to identify employees who need focus. The author states that managers should carefully identify the employees who will be important to invest time, energy, and other resources to develop their performance. He notes that managers...

  • Utilizing Feedback and Goal Setting to Increase Performance Appraisal Interviewer Skills of Managers. Nemeroff, Wayne F.; Cosentino, Joseph // Academy of Management Journal;Sep79, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p566 

    A field experiment was conducted to compare the effectiveness of two approaches to improving the way managers handle performance appraisal interviews with their subordinates. The results showed that the feedback plus goal setting condition was superior to the feedback-only condition and to the...

  • A FACTOR ANALYSIS OF AN INDUSTRIAL MERIT RATING SCALE. Ewart, Edwin; Seashore, S. E.; Tiffin, Joseph // Journal of Applied Psychology;Oct41, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p481 

    The article presents a statistical analysis of an industrial merit rating scale. The scale includes 12 traits including job performance, safety and health that would determine its effectivity. A factor analysis of the rating scale revealed abilities to do the present job and accounted for most...

  • Effect of Behavior Plus Outcome Goal Setting and Feedback on Employee Satisfaction and Performance. Kim, Jay S. // Academy of Management Journal;Mar1984, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p139 

    In a field experiment, goal setting and feedback involving both behavior and outcome simultaneously was found to be superior to that involving either behavior or outcome alone on sales performance, but not on employee satisfaction.

  • Research Notes. SUBORDINATES' CHARACTERISTICS, SUPERVISORS' RATINGS, AND DECISIONS TO DISCUSS APPRAISAL RESULTS. Feild, Hubert S.; Holley, William H. // Academy of Management Journal;Jun77, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p315 

    The article discusses the results of a 1977 study pertaining to subordinate characteristics, supervisory ratings, and decisions to discuss appraisal results. The research indicated that voluntary discussion of rating results is associated with lower performance appraisals. It was found that the...

  • Leadership Behaviors as Cues to Performance Evaluation. Graen, George; Dansereau Jr., Fred; Minami, Takao; Cashman, James // Academy of Management Journal;Dec1973, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p611 

    The possibility of employing the indirect feedback contained within a superior's behavior to obtain information about the relative effectiveness of current performance is explored. The results demonstrate that under certain conditions estimates of relative effectiveness can be made on the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics