TITLE

Introduction

AUTHOR(S)
Fitzpatrick, Melissa A.
PUB. DATE
April 2010
SOURCE
Critical Care Nurse;Apr2010 Supplement, pS2
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses various reports published within the issue and expresses gratitude to the authors who contributed their work. It claims that each section is written by thought leaders and clinical experts who discussed related evidence. In this supplement, they also described their techniques, processes of collaborative care, and outcomes associated with various mobilization interventions and strategies.
ACCESSION #
50841313

 

Related Articles

  • Editorial. van Rijsbergen, Keith // Computer Journal;May2000, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p167 

    The author expresses his gratitude to the contributors of the publication of " The Computer Journal." The author emphasizes that contributors help maintain the quality of the journal and the high academic standard it always aims. The author also emphasizes that reviewers are dedicated in being...

  • 2012 Editorial. Fitzgerald, John // New Zealand Journal of Psychology;2012, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p5 

    No abstract available.

  • Acknowledgment of Reviewers.  // Nicotine & Tobacco Research;Mar2013, Vol. 15 Issue 3, pNP 

    No abstract available.

  • Editor’s Acknowledgement.  // Rheumatology;Dec2010, Vol. 49 Issue 12, p2458 

    No abstract available.

  • SUPPORT: Asking different questions. Dugan, Daniel O. // Making the Rounds in Health, Faith & Ethics;2/12/96, Vol. 1 Issue 11, p1 

    Discusses the implications of the results of the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT), a study on the care of critically ill patients in the United States. Frequency of aggressive treatment in the presence of contraindications;...

  • SUPPORT: A medical educator's perspectives. Mermann, Alan C. // Making the Rounds in Health, Faith & Ethics;2/12/96, Vol. 1 Issue 11, p3 

    Comments on the results of the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT), a study on the care of critically ill patients in the United States. Efforts to improve communication between physicians and patients; Insensitivity to patients and their...

  • ICU patients want more, not less, life-sustaining effort.  // Brown University Long-Term Care Quality Advisor;8/26/96, Vol. 8 Issue 16, p7 

    Presents an abstract on an article titled `Patients' Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatment When the Expected Outcome is a Diminished Mental Health State: An Exploratory Study,' by D.J. Mazur et al published in the 44:565-568, 1996 issue of the `Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.'

  • Poor response to the critically ill.  // Australian Nursing Journal;Aug97, Vol. 5 Issue 2, p16 

    Reports on a study headed by Ira Wilson of the New England Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, which shows physicians' poor response to the preferences of the critically ill. Comparison of patients' views on death and quality of life issues with physicians' views.

  • Innovations in practice. Begany, Timothy // RN;Mar96, Vol. 59 Issue 3, p16 

    Provides information on a study on the breakdown of corneal in critically ill patients. Methods used to conduct the study; Results; Conclusion.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics