TITLE

Science: the rules of the game

AUTHOR(S)
ZAMORA-BONILLA, JESÚS
PUB. DATE
April 2010
SOURCE
Logic Journal of the IGPL;Apr2010, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p294
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Popper’s suggestion of taking methodological norms as conventions is examined from the point of view of game theory. The game of research is interpreted as a game of persuasion, in the sense that every scientists tries to advance claims, and that her winning the game consists in her colleagues accepting some of those claims as the conclusions of some arguments. Methodological norms are seen as elements in a contract established amongst researchers, that says what inferential moves are legitimate or compulsory in that game. Norms are classified in three groups: rules of internal inference (from claims to claims), entry norms (from events to claims), and exit norms (from claims to actions). It is argued that the value of a set of norms depends on how efficient they are in leading a scientific community to accept claims ranking high in a consensuated scale of epistemic value, and in giving each member of the community a reasonable expectation of winning some games.
ACCESSION #
50640777

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics