TITLE

Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Design

AUTHOR(S)
Lenk, Peter J.; Desarbo, Wayne S.; Green, Paul E.; Young, Martin R.
PUB. DATE
March 1996
SOURCE
Marketing Science;1996, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p173
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The drive to satisfy customers in narrowly defined market segments has led firms to offer wider arrays of products and services. Delivering products and services with the appropriate mix of features for these highly fragmented market segments requires understanding the value that customers place on these features. Conjoint analysis endeavors to unravel the value, or partworths, that customers place on the product or service's attributes from experimental subjects' evaluation of profiles based on hypothetical products or services. When the goal is to estimate the heterogeneity in the customers' partworths, traditional estimation methods, such as Least squares, require each subject to respond to more profiles than product attributes, resulting in lengthy questionnaires for complex, multiatiributed products or services. Long questionnaires pose practical and theoretical problems. Response rates tend to decrease with increasing questionnaire length, and more importantly, academic evidence indicates that long questionnaires may induce response biases. The problems associated with long questionnaires call for experimental designs and estimation methods that recover the heterogeneity in the partworths with shorter questionnaires. Unlike more popular estimation methods, Hierarchical Bayes (HB) random effects models do not require that individual-level design matrices be of full rank, which leads to the possibility of using fewer profiles per subject than currently used. Can this theoretical possibility be practically implemented? This paper tests this conjecture with empirical studies and mathematical analysis. The random effects model in the paper describes the heterogeneity in subject-level partworths or regression coefficients with a linear model that can include subject-level covariates. In addition, the error variances are specific to the subjects, thus allowing for the differential use of the measurement scale by different subjects. In the empirical study, subjects' responses to a full profile design are randomly deleted to test the performance of HB methods with declining sample sizes. These simple experiments indicate that NB methods can recover heterogeneity and estimate individual-level partworths, even when individual-level least squares estimators do not exist due to insufficient degrees of freedom. Motivated by these empirical studies, the paper analytically investigates the trade-off between the number of profiles per subject and the number of subjects on the statistical accuracy of the estimators that describe the partworth heterogeneity. The paper considers two experimental designs: each subject receives the same set of profiles, and subjects receive different blocks of a fractional factorial design. In the first case, the optimal design, subject to a budget constraint, uses more subjects and fewer profiles per subject when the ratio of unexplained, partworth heterogeneity to unexplained response variance is large. In the second case, one can maintain a given level of estimation accuracy as the number of profiles per subject decreases by increasing the number of subjects assigned to each block. These results provide marketing researchers the option of using shorter questionnaires for complex products or services. The analysis assumes that response quality is independent of questionnaire length and does not address the impact of design factors on response quality, If response quality and questionnaire length were, in fact, unrelated, then marketing researchers would still find the paper's results useful in improving the efficiency of their conjoint designs. However, if response quality were to decline with questionnaire length, as the preponderance of academic research indicates, then the option to use shorter questionnaires would become even more valuable.
ACCESSION #
5053043

 

Related Articles

  • Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Analysis of Conjoint Studies. Allenby, Greg M.; Arora, Neeraj; Ginter, James L. // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);May95, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p152 

    The authors use conjoint analysis to provide interval-level estimates of part-worths allowing tradeoffs among attribute levels to be examined. Researchers often possess prior information about the part-worths, such as the order and range restrictions of product attribute levels. It is known, for...

  • ON ALTERNATIVE EXPERIMENTAL METHODS FOR CONJOINT ANALYSIS. Leigh, Thomas W.; MacKay, David B.; Summers, John O. // Advances in Consumer Research;1981, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p317 

    The rise in popularity of conjoint analysis as an approach to studying consumer preferences has been accompanied by the development of a variety of alternative methodological procedures. Interest in this paper is focused on the performance of "experimentally efficient" designs. Issues which face...

  • Measuring Consumer Preferences Using Conjoint Poker. Toubia, Olivier; de Jong, Martijn G.; Stieger, Daniel; Füller, Johann // Marketing Science;Jan/Feb2012, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p138 

    We develop and test an incentive-compatible Conjoint Poker (CP) game. The preference data collected in the context of this game are comparable to incentive-compatible choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis data. We develop a statistical efficiency measure and an algorithm to construct efficient CP...

  • Compromising Between Information Completeness and Task Simplicity: A Comparison of Self-Explicated, Hierarchical Information Integration, and Full-profile Conjoint Methods. Oppewal, Harmen; Klabbers, Martijn // Advances in Consumer Research;2003, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p298 

    This paper compares hierarchical information integration (HII), full-profile (FP) conjoint and self-explicated (SE) approaches to preference measurement in terms of equality of preference structures, predictive abilities, and task load. HII is a method to accommodate larger numbers of attributes...

  • Adaptive Self-Explication of Multiattribute Preferences. Netzer, Oded; Srinivasan, V // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);Feb2011, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p140 

    The authors propose a Web-based adaptive self-explicated approach for multiattribute preference measurement (conjoint analysis) with a large number (ten or more) of attributes. The proposed approach overcomes some of the limitations of previous self-explicated approaches. The authors develop a...

  • Segmenting the Antihistamine Market: An Investigation of Consumer Preferences. Reardon, Gregory; Pathak, Dev S. // Journal of Health Care Marketing;Sep90, Vol. 10 Issue 3, p23 

    The authors combine conjoint analysis and contingent valuation into a single model to estimate the value of product attributes for antihistamine drugs. One hundred forty-three allergic rhinitis sufferers were examined. The results show evidence of validity in the data. Cluster analysis reveals...

  • The Inside Story. ALLENBY, GREG M. // Marketing Insights;Fall2013, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p10 

    The article offers information on ways marketers can asses causation, which is an intervention that motivates consumers to buy a product and build confidence that the causation will have the desired or at least some impact. It states that marketers should have confidence that consumers would...

  • MULTIATTRIBUTE CHOICE MODELS: A CRITICAL REVIEW. Danes, Jeffrey E.; Cattin, Philippe // Advances in Consumer Research;1981, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p323 

    This paper reviews and discusses the work by Green and Desarbo, "Two Models For Representing Unrestricted Choice Data," Leigh, Mackay, and Summers, "On Alternative Methods For Conjoint Analysis," and Acito and Olshavsky, "Limits To Accuracy in Conjoint Analysis."

  • An Empirical Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Self-Explicated, Huber-Hybrid, Traditional Conjoint, and Hybrid Conjoint Models. Akaah, Ishmael P.; Korgaonkar, Pradeep K. // Journal of Marketing Research (JMR);May83, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p187 

    The authors compare the predictive validity of different types of self-explicated, Huber-hybrid, traditional conjoint, and hybrid conjoint models. The results indicate that traditional and hybrid conjoint models outperform the self-explicated and Huber-hybrid models but are comparable in...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics