TITLE

Backing collisions: a study of drivers' eye and backing behaviour using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems

AUTHOR(S)
Hurwitz, David S.; Pradhan, Anuj; Fisher, Donald L.; Knodler, Michael A.; Muttart, Jeffrey W.; Menon, Rajiv; Meissner, Uwe
PUB. DATE
April 2010
SOURCE
Injury Prevention (1353-8047);Apr2010, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p79
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Context Backing crash injures can be severe; approximately 200 of the 2,500 reported injuries of this type per year to children under the age of 15 years result in death. Technology for assisting drivers when backing has limited success in preventing backing crashes. Objectives Two questions are addressed: Why is the reduction in backing crashes moderate when rear-view cameras are deployed? Could rear-view cameras augment sensor systems? Design 46 drivers (36 experimental, 10 control) completed 16 parking trials over 2 days (eight trials per day). Experimental participants were provided with a sensor camera system, controls were not. Three crash scenarios were introduced. Setting Parking facility at UMass Amherst, USA. Subjects 46 drivers (33 men, 13 women) average age 29 years, who were Massachusetts residents licensed within the USA for an average of 9.3 years. Interventions Vehicles equipped with a rear-view camera and sensor system-based parking aid. Main Outcome Measures Subject's eye fixations while driving and researcher's observation of collision with objects during backing. Results Only 20% of drivers looked at the rear-view camera before backing, and 88% of those did not crash. Of those who did not look at the rear-view camera before backing, 46% looked after the sensor warned the driver. Conclusions This study indicates that drivers not only attend to an audible warning, but will look at a rear-view camera if available. Evidence suggests that when used appropriately, rear-view cameras can mitigate the occurrence of backing crashes, particularly when paired with an appropriate sensor system.
ACCESSION #
50225103

 

Related Articles

  • SAVING LIVES.  // Machine Design;4/1/2004, Vol. 76 Issue 7, p123 

    Provides information on the use of the automatic crash-notification sensors from OnStar on the 2004 Chevrolet Malibu automobile. Features of the sensors; Benefit of the sensors to rural areas; Percentage of rural automobile accidents.

  • Child car seats in the USA may be required for protection in side-impact crashes.  // Injury Prevention (1353-8047);Apr2014, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p102 

    The article reports on the plan of National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to include a side crash simulation test for child car seats which aims to prevent about 5 children fatalities and 64 injuries related to car accidents yearly.

  • Road accidents--priorities and possibilities.  // British Medical Journal;2/3/1979, Vol. 1 Issue 6159, p328 

    Focuses on the priorities and preventions of road accidents. Features for crash protection; Relationship between road safety and car dependence; Information and education on road safety. INSET: What other countries do.

  • CDC Study Finds Crash Notification Systems Improve Patient Outcomes.  // Educator Update;Summer2009, p26 

    The article presents a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the U.S. which shows that advanced automatic crash notification (AACN) systems can improve outcomes for injured patients. It mentions that using AACN improves results among severely injured crash patients by...

  • To Serve and Protect. Wilhite, Charles // Automotive Body Repair News;Apr2003, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p62 

    Focuses on the importance of passenger safety in times of collision. Significance of understanding various systems that protect passengers; Details of the primary concerns in cars; Use of seat belts to protect the driver and passengers.

  • How safe is your car? What insurance data say.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Nov95, Vol. 78 Issue 11, p17 

    Presents statistical information on the safety of cars in the event of car crashes. Insurance data listed. INSET: Injury and collision loss experience for 1992-1994 model cars..

  • Mandatory STABILITY CONTROL. Cameron, Kevin // Cycle World;May2010, Vol. 49 Issue 5, p14 

    The article reports on the move of the U.S. government to make electronic stability control (ESC) mandatory in all cars in the country by 2012 with the aim to minimize car crashes.

  • From the ed. Page, Ewen // Motor;Nov96, Vol. 44 Issue 6, p5 

    Explains the urgency of promoting automobile safety to reduce the incidents of car accidents in Australia. Importance of improving the driving skills of motorists; Uselessness of the cars' safety features in the hands of reckless drivers.

  • Safety in cars. Saunders, Carol Silverman // Current Health 2;Apr96, Vol. 22 Issue 8, p16 

    Discusses safety in automobiles in the United States. Reduction of motor-vehicle deaths by 1994; National Safety Council's report on injuries and deaths due to car crashes; Use and effectiveness of safety belts, anti-lock braking systems (ABS), and air bags in automobiles; Information on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics