TITLE

Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams

AUTHOR(S)
Bogart III, Major Adrian T.
PUB. DATE
July 2001
SOURCE
Army Logistician;Jul/Aug2001, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p21
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents an example of how the United States Department of Defense supports civil authorities' efforts to meet the emerging threats of the twenty-first century. Formation of weapons of mass destruction civil support teams; Civil support team (CST) genesis; CST training and equipment.
ACCESSION #
5021964

 

Related Articles

  • Stress Test.  // Government Executive;Jan2011, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p14 

    The article presents information on a discussion of the U.S. Government executives on the ongoing leadership and challenges the U.S. Department of Defense is facing. It is stated that the challenge in Afghanistan is that of the phenomenon of refuge borders. Concerns are expressed over weapons of...

  • Combating Terrorism: Use of National Guard Response Teams Is Unclear: T-NSIAD-99-184. Gebicke, Mark E. // GAO Reports;6/23/1999, p1 

    The Defense Department (DOD) recently approved the creation of 10 National Guard response teams to help state and local authorities deal with terrorists attacks involving weapons of mass destruction. GAO found differing views on the role and the use of these response teams and how they will fit...

  • TWO MORE CIVIL SUPPORT TEAMS CERTIFIED.  // Army Logistician;May/Jun2006, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p55 

    The article reports on the certification of the New Jersey and Indiana National Guard teams by the U.S. Department of Defense. The two teams, which will be part of the of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Civil Support Teams, are among the authorized in the Defense Appropriations Act for fiscal...

  • New Priorities for Pentagon. Fulghum, David A. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;11/9/1998, Vol. 149 Issue 19, p36 

    Reports that according to Hans Mark, the United States Pentagon's director of defense research and engineering, the Pentagon needs to change its priorities and concentrate on developing more `decisive' weapons that can be supplied to troops in the field. Information on some of the weapons for...

  • Consistency Counts. Miller, Bruce E. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Oct2010, Vol. 136 Issue 10, p8 

    The article focuses on the policies of U.S. President Barack Obama to reduce the threat of nuclear proliferation and terrorism, biological terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. Although Obama has proposed various strategies for preventing nuclear and biological threats and for homeland and...

  • Weapons of Mass Destruction: DOD's Actions to Combat Weapons Use Should Be More Integrated and Focused: NSIAD-00-97.  // GAO Reports;5/26/2000, p1 

    In response to the growing threat posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, the Pentagon announced its Defense Counterproliferation Initiative in 1993. The Initiative calls for the development of offensive and defensive capabilities--to include equipping, training,...

  • Chemical Weapons: Lessons Learned Program Generally Effective but Could Be Improved and Expanded: GAO-02-890.  // GAO Reports;9/10/2002, p1 

    The Army has been tasked to destroy 31,500 tons of highly toxic chemical agents by April 2007, the deadline set by an international treaty for the elimination of all chemical weapon stockpiles. To destroy the weapons, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the Army Chemical Demilitarization...

  • Chemical and Biological Defense: DOD Should Clarify Expectations for Medical Readiness: GAO-02-219T.  // GAO Reports;11/7/2001, p1 

    A 1995 Presidential Decision Directive gave the highest priority to developing the capabilities to detect, prevent, defeat, and manage the consequences of a nuclear, biological, or chemical attack. In addition, the former Secretary of Defense emphasized at his 1997 confirmation hearing the...

  • Weapons of Mass Destruction: Effort to Reduce Russian Arsenals May Cost More, Achieve Less Than Planned: NSIAD-99-76.  // GAO Reports;4/13/1999, p1 

    The Defense Department (DOD) has since the early 1990s supported the construction of two Russian facilities designed to help reduce Russian arsenals of nuclear and chemical weapons. The first, a storage facility now being built at Russia's Mayak nuclear complex, is intended to provide safe and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics