TITLE

REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS

AUTHOR(S)
Werner, Ray O.; Griffiths, L.C.; Duggan, Michael A.
PUB. DATE
January 1979
SOURCE
Journal of Marketing;Jan1979, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p81
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on legal developments in marketing relative to the regulation of monopolistic methods. In regard to market control, the article addresses Applied Digital Technology, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co. where the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District found that arbitration of a contract dispute was inappropriate where antitrust issues are an issue. In regard to collusive practices, the article discusses Sitkin Smelting and Refining Co., Inc. v. FMC Corp., where "sham bidding," while reprehensible, was not found to violate the Sherman Act. Regarding market exclusion tactics, the U.S. Supreme Court found in National Broiler Marketing Assn.(NBMA) v. U.S., that the NBMA was not entitled to an antitrust exemption because not all producers were "farmers."
ACCESSION #
5005053

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics