More firms use courts to block strikes

April 2010
People Management;4/22/2010, p10
The article reports on the increase in the number of employers in Great Britain that use court injunctions to block strike actions in 2010.


Related Articles

  • Strikers lose round in court.  // Editor & Publisher;08/23/97, Vol. 130 Issue 34, p13 

    Focuses on a federal judge's ruling that ensures there will be no quick return to work for the great majority of the Detroit, Michigan newspaper employees who walked off their jobs in July 1995. Rejection of the National Labor Relations Board's request for a 10(j) injunction that would have...

  • Employer Interference Precludes Strike Injunction. Baker, Michael J. // California Law Review;Mar1973, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p524 

    Discusses the California Supreme Court case 'Englund vs. Chavez,' which considered whether employer interference precludes strike injunction. Facts of the case; Preemption of state court jurisdiction of labor disputes by the federal Labor-Management Relations Act; Court rulings in previous...

  • Public sector warned against using injunctions to block strikes.  // Employers Law;Jun2010, p4 

    The article reports that British public sector employers have been advised against using injunctions to block strikes, after a number of private sector firms, including Johnston Press and British Airways, turned to the courts against industrial action in May 2010.

  • National Emergency Disputes Under Taft-Hartley: A Legal Definition. Levin, Richard A. // Labor Law Journal;Jan71, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p29 

    To date, it is observed, the government has compiled an admirable record in obtaining injunctions against strikes which threaten national health or safety--perfect success. "National health or safety," though, under Taft-Hartley, is difficult to define since essentially all that is required for...

  • Injunctions and Starvation.  // America;3/10/1928, Vol. 38 Issue 22, p526 

    The author reflects on a blanket injunction imposed by a federal court in Pennsylvania against miners who launched strikes in 1928. According to the author, such injunction will remove certain natural and constitutional rights of a miner and may subject him into a summary punishment should he...

  • Picketing of Marine Terminals to Protest Work Assignments Enjoined.  // Labor Law Journal;Dec69, Vol. 20 Issue 12, p807 

    This article reports on the temporary injunction issued against two teamster locals that have been engaged in picketing marine terminals during a work assignment dispute with longshoremen pending before the National Labor Relations Board for determination. California's U.S. District Court viewed...

  • Restrictions on the Right to Strike in the Railroads: A History and Analysis (II). Newborn, Norton N. // Labor Law Journal;Apr73, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p234 

    The article examines the impact of the Norris-LaGuardia Act and the Railway Labor Act on the right to strike on the railroads sector in the U.S. The 1932 Norris-LaGuardia Act removed jurisdiction from the federal courts to enjoin a variety of labor union activity and imposed requirements upon...

  • Injunction Against Prospective Strikes.  // Labor Law Journal;Jul76, Vol. 27 Issue 7, p441 

    This article discusses court decisions on cases concerning labor-management relations in the U.S. as of July 1976. In the U.S. Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers case, the union had struck seven times in 12 months. The Third Circuit court ruled, however, that the injunction had to address...

  • Strike on hold.  // Rail Business Intelligence;10/7/2004, Issue 231, p12 

    Reports on the decision of labor union RMT to suspend the industrial action of engineering and ground staff at freight operator EWS Railways in Great Britain in October 2004. Allegation of EWS against RMT regarding the compliance of the union with the statutory requirements for balloting...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics