Institute of Medicine top priorities for CER

May 2010
Clinical Trials Administrator;May2010, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p51
The article outlines some of the top priorities of the Institute of Medicine for comparative-effectiveness research (CER) in line with the receipt of funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. They include treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation, different treatments for hearing loss in children and adults, upper endoscopy utilization, strategies for reducing health care associated infections (HAI) and management strategies for localized prostrate cancer.


Related Articles

  • Federal research initiative aims to compare effective treatments. Gooch, Jamie // Managed Healthcare Executive;Jun2010, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p23 

    The article reports on the funding of a comparative-effectiveness research (CER) in the U.S. which compares benefits and harms of different prevention, diagnosis and treatment methods of certain diseases. It states that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 has allocated 1.1 billion...

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research to Shape Biotech Studies. Wechsler, Jill // BioPharm International;May2009, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p18 

    The article addresses issues on the stimulus package for comparative effectiveness (CE) research in the U.S. This provision divides the $1.1 billion in funds among the three arms of the Department of Health and Human Services. It cites how these agencies dole out the money will be shaped by a...

  • Stimulus Funds Force Hard Look at Comparative Effectiveness Research. Tuma, Rabiya S. // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;8/5/2009, Vol. 101 Issue 15, p1036 

    The article focuses on the scope and definition of comparative effectiveness research (CER). It notes that the $1.1 billion stimulus funds allocated for CER has raised the issue on what constitutes it. It discusses the two reports, one from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and another from the...

  • IOM identifies the top priorities for comparative effectiveness research.  // AHA News;7/6/2009, Vol. 45 Issue 14, p3 

    The article reports on the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in the U.S. for topics to be prioritized for research on the effectiveness of various health care services and treatment options. IOM was required by the 2009 American Recovery and Investment Act to submit...

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research Gets Funding. Frei, Rosemary // Oncology Nursing News;Oct2009, Vol. 3 Issue 7, p20 

    The article reports that the comparative effectiveness research (CER) receives funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The law which was signed by President Barack Obama in February 17, 2009, allocates about 400 million dollars for CER to the Department of Health and...

  • HHS, IOM Take First Steps on Comparative Effectiveness. Young, Donna // BioWorld Today;3/23/2009, Vol. 20 Issue 54, p1 

    The article presents an update on efforts by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in meeting the deadlines set by the Congress for spending the $1.1 billion budgeted for comparative effectiveness research as of March 23, 2009. These include...

  • The Comparative-Effectiveness Controversy. Wechsler, Jill // Pharmaceutical Technology;May2009, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p30 

    The article focuses on the government funding issue for the comparative effectiveness (CE) research program in the U.S. It mentions that the CE research program is included in the $789 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 and is allocated $1 billion. However, its...

  • IOM Publishes Report of Comparative Effectiveness Research Priorities.  // American Family Physician;8/1/2009, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p221 

    The article announces the publication of a report on 100 health-related topics that should be the focus of federal investment in comparative effectiveness research in the U.S. by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 2009. The investment pertains to the $400 million allocated for research under the...

  • Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Report From the Institute of Medicine. Sox, Harold C.; Greenfield, Sheldon // Annals of Internal Medicine;8/4/2009, Vol. 151 Issue 3, p203 

    The article offers information on the comparative effective research (CER) on health care proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). It offers a definition of CER which aims to promote health care improvement at...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics