Europe's taxmen 'should levy duty'

Berman, Chloe
March 2010
Travel Weekly (UK);3/26/2010, Vol. 5, p8
Trade Publication
The article discusses the case of Med Hotels Ltd., which is liable to pay value-added tax (VAT) under the Tour Operators' Margin Scheme of Great Britain Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (HMRC).


Related Articles

  • 'Non-principals threaten industry' Hayhurst, Lee // Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland;6/27/2008, Issue 2823, p2 

    The article states that agents in Great Britain have been warned that working with nonprincipal suppliers is no alternative to principal status. It notes that such suppliers offer indemnities that pay out in the event of an accident but lack moral and legal responsibility. The renewed calls for...

  • PRINCIPAL OR AGENT. VAT OR NO VAT. IMPLICATIONS OF MED HOTELS LTD v HMRC. Venables, Richard; Bevan-Jones, Katie // Travel Law Quarterly;Sep2010, Vol. 2 Issue 3, p139 

    The article focuses on the authors' insights on the agency business model adopted by travel companies, along with the implication of Med Hotels Ltd.'s decision on the travel sector. They mention the advantages for bed banks, tour operators, and internet split contractors in acting as agents as...

  • Principal confusion puts public at risk. Josephides, Noel // Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland;6/27/2008, Issue 2823, p11 

    The article comments on the decision of Medhotels, the father of all bed banks, to switch back to acting as an agent. The author notes that Medhotels is reversing to its former status because it has been forced to add a hefty amount to each booking to cover value-added tax (VAT) on Tour...

  • Medhotels case rocks bed banks.  // Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland;10/2/2009, Issue 2883, p4 

    The article reports on the 11 million-dollar claim filed by bed bank Med Hotels Ltd., owned by Thomas Cook, against Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs which will be heard on November 23, 2009 in London, England. It states that the case is viewed to affect the independent bed banks that act as...

  • HMRC might look at other businesses. Wright, Damon // Travel Weekly (UK);3/26/2010, Vol. 5, p8 

    The article informs that Med Hotels Ltd. is liable to pay value-added tax (VAT) through the Tour Operators' Margin Scheme to the Government of Great Britain.

  • Sales may be hit by 'VAT confusion' Gray, Chris; Griffiths, Sophie // Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland;1/7/2011, Issue 2941, p4 

    The article reports on the concern of the British tour operators and agents that the confusion on value-added tax (VAT) will have an impact on their key selling period in January 2011.

  • Iceland plan VAT spike.  // Travel Daily;9/12/2012, p5 

    The article reports that the government of Iceland has been urged by the European Tour Operators Association to drop plans to triple the nation's value-added-tax (VAT) charge on restaurant meals, accommodations, and attractions to 25.2% from 7% from May 2013.

  • Kenyan VAT hike forces up package costs. Merrick, Hollie-Rae; Ashwell, Emily // Travel Weekly (UK);9/19/2013, Issue 2186, p6 

    The article reports on the Value Added Tax (VAT) Act 2013 that came into force in Kenya on September 1, 2013 which adds a 16 percent levy on certain packaged services offered by tour operators.

  • Negotiating the VAT maze. Burnham, Andrew // Travel Trade Gazette UK & Ireland;7/7/2011, Issue 2966, p27 

    The article presents the author's insights on the proper payment of value added tax (VAT) among travel businesses in Great Britain. The author states that Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) targets to add VAT revenue in travel businesses accounting under Tour Operators Margin Scheme...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics