TITLE

PARADIGMS, THEORIES, AND THE PRIMACY OF THE HEP-NEP DISTINCTION

AUTHOR(S)
Catton Jr., William R.; Dunlap, Riley E.
PUB. DATE
November 1978
SOURCE
American Sociologist;Nov78, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p256
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article provides information on the paradigms, theories, and the primacy of the distinction between the Human Exceptionalism Paradigm (HEP) and the New Environmental Paradigm (NEP). A paradigm is an image shared by members of a scientific community telling them the nature of their science's subject-matter. Given a particular paradigm, certain kinds of questions are askable and certain kinds of hypotheses are conceivable, but a paradigm is not very specific that a coherent and detailed theory must follow logically and uniquely from it. The NEP reveals a new dimension of redistribution, which is the competition discerned between people living versus posterity. Such a diachronic competition besets all industrial societies, committed as they are to massive dependency upon exhaustible resources. Cleavage between NEP-adherents and HEP-adherents is more fundamental. Theoretical groupings such as functionalism, exchange, and Marxism, among others, within contemporary sociology do differ. However, the developing NEP-HEP cleavage cuts across such theoretical perspectives. NEP-oriented analysis of the changing conditions differs markedly from the implicitly HEP-oriented analysis.
ACCESSION #
4951150

 

Related Articles

  • ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY: A NEW PARADIGM. Catton Jr., William R.; Dunlap, Riley E. // American Sociologist;Feb78, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p41 

    Ostensibly diverse and competing theoretical perspectives in sociology are alike in their shared anthropocentrism. From any of these perspectives, therefore, much contemporary and future social experience has to seem anomalous Environmental sociologists attempt to understand recent societal...

  • A PARADIGM TOO FAR? A DYNAMIC STABILITY RECONSIDERATION OF THE SOCIAL NETWORK RESEARCH PROGRAM. Kilduff, Martin; Tsai, Wenpin; Hanke, Ralph // Academy of Management Review;Oct2006, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1031 

    Instead of paradigmatic unity, we call for progressive theory development from a set of core concepts (Lakatos, 1970) comprising primacy of relations, ubiquity of embeddedness, social utility of connections, and structural patterning of social life. Organizational network research can capture...

  • THREE MODELS OF SCIENTIFIC DEVELOPMENT. Mulkay, M. J. // Sociological Review;Aug75, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p509 

    In this paper I am going to discuss three generalised accounts, or 'models', of the processes by which science develops.[1] I shall call these the 'model of openness', the 'model of closure', and the 'model of branching'. The central concern of each is to show how social factors operating within...

  • GENDER STRATIFICATION AND PARADIGM CHANGE. Ferree, Myra Marx; Hall, Elaine J. // American Sociological Review;Jun2000, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p475 

    The article focuses on gender stratification and paradigm change. These changes are followed by inequality of Race, Class and Gender in Introductory Sociology. The gender-relations perspective locates the origins of inequality between men and women in the social organization of relations between...

  • PARADIGM: LOST AND PARADIGM REGAINED: CRITIQUE OF DANNEFER'S PORTRAYAL OF LIFE-SPAN DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. Baltes, Paul B.; Nesselroade, John R. // American Sociological Review;Dec84, Vol. 49 Issue 6, p841 

    In the article, the authors comment on the article "Adult Development and Social Theory: A Paradigmatic Reappraisal," by Dale Dannefer, published in the February 1984 issue of the journal "American Sociological Review." According to the authors, Dannefer presents a review and challenging...

  • Nuevas perspectivas en la investigación social hoy: anhelos, dificultades y posibilidades. Fernández Poncela, Anna María // Estudios Sobre las Culturas Contemporáneas;Winter2015, Vol. 21 Issue 42, p109 

    This is a general reflection on Social Sciences research. A reflection on the new paradigms, methodologies and research techniques. A reflection also about new methodologies, as well as the difficulties and complexities of their practice today.

  • Democracy: Four Paradigmatic Views. Ardalan, Kavous // Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences;Feb2011, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p104 

    Any explanation of democracy is based on a worldview. The premise of this paper is that any worldview can be associated with one of the four broad paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist. This paper takes the case of democracy and discusses it from the...

  • Dialectical Sociology: An Exemplar for the 1970s. Friedrichs, Robert W. // Social Forces;May72, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p447 

    The three levels of "paradigms" held applicable to all knowledge communities by Thomas Kuhn are discussed, and the fourth--exemplars--deemed by Kuhn to be applicable only to natural scientific communities, is found to be of heuristic value in comprehending the paradigmatic communal life of...

  • RECITS DE VIE ET VIE QUOTIDIENNE. D'Epinay, Christian Lalive // Swiss Journal of Sociology;1983, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p37 

    Referring to reports about life courses, the author reflects upon the paradigms of the sociology of everyday life. Recent tendencies in research have sufficiently shown that routine always emerges from routine procedures; further, they have clearly brought out the ideological character of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics