TITLE

Facilitating access to pre-processed research evidence in public health

AUTHOR(S)
Robeson, Paula; Dobbins, Maureen; DeCorby, Kara; Tirilis, Daiva
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2010, Vol. 10, p95
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Evidence-informed decision making is accepted in Canada and worldwide as necessary for the provision of effective health services. This process involves: 1) clearly articulating a practice-based issue; 2) searching for and accessing relevant evidence; 3) appraising methodological rigor and choosing the most synthesized evidence of the highest quality and relevance to the practice issue and setting that is available; and 4) extracting, interpreting, and translating knowledge, in light of the local context and resources, into practice, program and policy decisions. While the public health sector in Canada is working toward evidence-informed decision making, considerable barriers, including efficient access to synthesized resources, exist. Methods: In this paper we map to a previously developed 6 level pyramid of pre-processed research evidence, relevant resources that include public health-related effectiveness evidence. The resources were identified through extensive searches of both the published and unpublished domains. Results: Many resources with public health-related evidence were identified. While there were very few resources dedicated solely to public health evidence, many clinically focused resources include public health-related evidence, making tools such as the pyramid, that identify these resources, particularly helpful for public health decisions makers. A practical example illustrates the application of this model and highlights its potential to reduce the time and effort that would be required by public health decision makers to address their practice-based issues. Conclusions: This paper describes an existing hierarchy of pre-processed evidence and its adaptation to the public health setting. A number of resources with public health-relevant content that are either freely accessible or requiring a subscription are identified. This will facilitate easier and faster access to pre-processed, public health-relevant evidence, with the intent of promoting evidence-informed decision making. Access to such resources addresses several barriers identified by public health decision makers to evidence-informed decision making, most importantly time, as well as lack of knowledge of resources that house public health-relevant evidence.
ACCESSION #
49160587

 

Related Articles

  • Better Guidance Is Welcome, but without Blinders. Peters, David H.; Bennett, Sara // PLoS Medicine;Mar2012, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p1 

    The authors discusses the guidance for evidence-informed decisions about health systems produced by the members of the World Health Organization (WHO) Task Force on Developing Health Systems Guidance. They recognize the importance of systematization in process that collage and evaluate the...

  • Cochrane update: building capacity in evidence-informed decision-making to improve public health. Pettman, Tahna L.; Armstrong, Rebecca; Jones, Kirsty; Waters, Elizabeth; Doyle, Jodie // Journal of Public Health;Dec2013, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p624 

    The article discusses the methods of implementing and analyzing evidence-informed public health (EIPH) training courses by the Cochrane Public Health Group (CPHG). It discusses the use of knowledge translation and exchange (KTE) strategies to support evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM). The...

  • NICE announces new public health quality standards. Turnbull, Alex // Independent Nurse;Oct2014, p4 

    No abstract available.

  • Turning evidence into recommendations: Protocol of a study guideline development groups. Michie, Susan; Berentson-Shaw, Jessica; Pilling, Stephen; Feder, Gene; Dieppe, Paul; Raine, Rosalind; Cluzeau, Francoise; Alderson, Phil; Ellis, Simon // Implementation Science;2007, Vol. 2, p29 

    Background: Health care practice based on research evidence requires that evidence is synthesised, and that recommendations based on this evidence are implemented. It also requires an intermediate step: translating synthesised evidence into practice recommendations. There is considerable...

  • Marketing Through Evidenced-based Commodification.  // Pharmaceutical Executive;Oct2004, Vol. 24 Issue 10, p104 

    Focuses on the incorporation of evidence-based medicine in routine physician decision-making in the United States. Acceptance of the need to systematically improve quality; Adoption of standard guidelines and protocols to control costs; Availability of technology for industrywide implementation...

  • Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan. Armstrong, Rebecca; Waters, Elizabeth; Dobbins, Maureen; Anderson, Laurie; Moore, Laurence; Petticrew, Mark; Clark, Rachel; Pettman, Tahna L.; Burns, Catherine; Moodie, Marjorie; Conning, Rebecca; Swinburn, Boyd // Implementation Science;2013, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1 

    Background Knowledge translation strategies are an approach to increase the use of evidence within policy and practice decision-making contexts. In clinical and health service contexts, knowledge translation strategies have focused on individual behavior change, however the multi-system context...

  • Evidence-based policy revisited: orientation towards the policy process and a public health policy science. Rütten, Alfred // International Journal of Public Health;Jun2012, Vol. 57 Issue 3, p455 

    No abstract available.

  • Determining guiding principles for evidence-based practice. Dale, Andrea E. // Nursing Standard;3/1/2006, Vol. 20 Issue 25, p41 

    The article discusses the guiding principles of evidence-based practice (EBP). EBP is an overarching concept that spans all healthcare professions. The principles collaborating EBP take account on the part played by the profession, practitioner and the need for desirable patient outcomes,...

  • Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results. Treweek, Shaun; Oxman, Andrew D.; Alderson, Philip; Bossuyt, Patrick M.; Brandt, Linn; Brożek, Jan; Davoli, Marina; Flottorp, Signe; Harbour, Robin; Hill, Suzanne; Liberati, Alessandro; Liira, Helena; Schünemann, Holger J.; Rosenbaum, Sarah; Thornton, Judith; Vandvik, Per Olav; Alonso-Coello, Pablo // Implementation Science;2013, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1 

    Background: Healthcare decision makers face challenges when using guidelines, including understanding the quality of the evidence or the values and preferences upon which recommendations are made, which are often not clear. Methods: GRADE is a systematic approach towards assessing the quality of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics