SEC 'Skin' Rule Won't Cut Deep

Berry, Kate
April 2010
American Banker;4/8/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 54, p7
Trade Publication
The article discusses the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's proposal for regulatory reform concerning securities risk retention and disclosure of loan-level information.


Related Articles

  • SEC Proposes Exemption To Risk-Retention Rule. Quigley, Joan // Bond Buyer;3/31/2011, Vol. 375 Issue 33492, p1 

    The article reports that a proposed rule which exempts municipal securities from credit-risk retention requirements has been approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the U.S. It notes that a minimum economic interest in a material portion of the credit risk being securitized...

  • Don't Hold Your Breath for Another 'No-Action' Letter on CLOs. Bisbey, Allison // High Yield Report;9/18/2015, p2 

    The article focuses on the publication of letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to collateralized loan obligation (CLO) industry which deals for more explicit guidance from regulators. Topics discussed include clarification that CLO manager will keep managers from the...

  • Top 10 of 2015: CLO Managers Get Their Skin in the Game. Bisbey, Allison // Structuredfinancenews.com;12/16/2015, p2 

    No abstract available.

  • SEC PROPOSES TO OVERHAUL REGULATION OF ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES. McGee, Carol; Roth, Gary D.; Castillo, Tara // Banking Law Journal;Jun2010, Vol. 127 Issue 6, p523 

    The article focuses on the proposed rule of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), intended for the substantial modification of the regulation for the asset-backed securities (ABS). It mentions that the commission's reliance on credit ratings can be reduced with some eligibility...

  • LSTA Challenges 'Arbitrary' Risk Retention Rule in Court. Scully, Matt // High Yield Report;12/1/2014, p1 

    The Loan Syndications and Trading Association filed a petition against the Federal Reserve Board and Securities and Exchange Commission, asking a D.C. Court of Appeals to suspend the final risk retention rule approved by regulators last month.

  • MBA submits comments on Reg AB proposed revisions.  // Mortgage Banking;Sep2010, Vol. 70 Issue 12, p104 

    The article reports on the move of Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) of America to provide the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with comments on the issues regarding the proposed revisions to Regulation AB. It states that the issues include the discussion on the impact of the...

  • LSTA Fights Another CLO Regulation Battle. Kellerhals, Richard // High Yield Report;4/11/2011, Vol. 22 Issue 15, p17 

    The article discusses the reaction of the Loan Syndications and Trading Association about the proposed regulations of the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) for collateralized loan obligations (CLOs). According to Meredith Coffey of LSTA, they are critical of the risk retention rules...

  • ‘No Action’ Letter Provides CLOs Limited Relief from Risk Retention. Bisbey, Allison // Structuredfinancenews.com;7/20/2015, p1 

    It provides limited relief from risk retention rules for pre-2015 vintage CLO notes that are refinanced after December 2016.

  • Little Relief for CLOs from Risk Retention. G. F.; A. B. // Leveraged Finance News;10/27/2014, Vol. 4 Issue 41, p1 

    The article reports on the final rules approved by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other four U.S. agencies, which provide little relief for collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) from risk retention. The final rules require CLO managers to retain 5%...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics