TITLE

TRADITIONAL STATE INTERESTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS: IMPRESSIVE CASES IN CONVENTIONAL SETTINGS

AUTHOR(S)
Friedelbaum, Stanley H.
PUB. DATE
June 2001
SOURCE
Albany Law Review;2001, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p1245
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the judicial federalism in the United States. Cross-sectional analysis of conventional cases; Assessment on state constitutional law; Examination of a provision on meritocracy.
ACCESSION #
4888204

 

Related Articles

  • A Theory of U.S. Constitutional History. Wolfe, Christopher // Journal of Politics;May81, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p292 

    Analyzes the traditional and modern judicial review in the United States constitutional history. Traditional position on constitutional interpretation and judicial review; Justification of modern interpretation through the due process clause and the Fourteenth Amendment; Implications to the...

  • Judicial review of impeachment proceedings: Nixon... Amrine, Thomas D. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Autumn93, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p809 

    Dicusses impeachment proceedings in the United States Senate from a judicial perspective. Reference to the case of Ritter versus United States; Details on the Impeachment Trial Clause of the Constitution which grants exclusive power to the Senate to try impeachments; Political aspects of...

  • Rethinking the Constitution-treaty relationship: A reply to Remy Z. Levin & Paul Chen. Carter, William M. // International Journal of Constitutional Law;Jan2012, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p261 

    The article discusses the relationship between Constitution and treaty in the U.S., relative to the reexamination of the legal relationship of the two parties by Remy Z. Levin and Paul Chen. It argues that it is inaccurate to discuss treaties adjusting to the Constitution. The author suggests...

  • AGAINST TEXTUALISM. Treanor, William Michael // Northwestern University Law Review;2009 Special Issue, Vol. 103 Issue 2, p983 

    In this article, the author discusses the prevailing assumption that textualist readings recover the original public meaning of the U.S. Constitution. He shows the importance of nontextual factors in early interpretation of the Constitution. He discusses his argument drawn on his work analyzing...

  • Foreign Precedent in State Constitutional Interpretation. Marshfield, Jonathan L. // Duquesne Law Review;Summer2015, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p413 

    An essay on the use of foreign law in constitutional interpretation is presented. Topics discussed include difference between state constitutional interpretation and federal constitutional interpretation; use of foreign law by American courts when interpreting domestic constitutional provisions...

  • THE TEXTUALIST THIRD AMENDMENT. COTTONE, MICHAEL A. // Tennessee Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p538 

    The article examine the textualism of the third amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Topics discussed include interpretation of language of the amendment by the judges and other decision-maker in the country; strict textualism concerning the amendment; ability of the constitutional text; and...

  • Justice Holmes and the Modernization of Free Speech Jurisprudence: The Human Dimension. White, G. Edward // California Law Review;Mar1992, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p391 

    A central puzzle for scholarship on the life and career of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes has been the tension between his generally deferential theory of judicial review, premised on his acquiescence to majoritarian legislative power, and his role as the founder of modern First Amendment...

  • The Fundamental and Natural Law 'Repugnant Review' Origins of Judicial Review: A Synergy of early English Corporate Law with Notions of Fundamental and Natural Law. Perrone, Lawrence Joseph // BYU Journal of Public Law;2008, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p61 

    The article outlines the various understandings of the judicial review origins and the synergy of early corporate law with notions of Fundamental and natural law in the U.S. It notes that the Constitution does not authorize judicial review which resulted in debates over its origins. The analysis...

  • The McCulloch Theory of the Fourteenth Amendment: City of Boerne v. Flores and the Original... Engel, Steven A. // Yale Law Journal;Oct99, Vol. 109 Issue 1, p115 

    Contrasts the theory of judicial review that was understood by the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment on the United States Constitution from the Supreme Court's decision in the `City of Boerne vs. Flores.' Details on the text of the first draft; Changes included in the second version of the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics