TITLE

ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT: Implementation of the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006

AUTHOR(S)
Powner, David A.
PUB. DATE
March 2010
SOURCE
GAO Reports;3/12/2010, preceding p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Document
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers the U.S. Government Accountability Office's report on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) that requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to have an accessible Web site containing federal awards data. GAO's objective is to determine if the OMB is complying with FFATA, and if federal agencies are reporting required data available. GAO recommends that OMB should ensure complete reporting and clarify guidance for agency data reporting.
ACCESSION #
48878253

 

Related Articles

  • ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT ACT.  // GAO Reports;9/14/2012, p1 

    The article presents the assessment of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the efforts of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to fulfill the requirements of the E-Government Act of 2002. GAO reviewed reports of OMB on compliance with the requirements and interviewed OMB and...

  • Agencies Can Make Greater Use of Existing Data, but Continued Progress Is Needed on Access and Quality Issues.  // GAO Reports;3/26/2012, preceding p1 

    The article presents a report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the role of the Office of Management and Budget, agencies and interstatistical committees to improve federal information collection efforts. It says that with the increase in demand for better information, rising...

  • Opportunities Exist to Strengthen OMB's Approach to Improving Efficiency. Steinhardt, Bernice // GAO Reports;6/7/2010, preceding p1 

    The article examines the types of Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) efficiency measures undertaken by the U.S. government and the challenges programs faced in the development and the usage of the efficiency measures. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) analyzes the 36 efficiency...

  • HIGH-RISK SERIES: An Update.  // GAO Reports;1/22/2009, preceding p1 

    The article presents the report of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to the U.S. Congress in January 2009. According to the January 2007 report, GAO has detailed 27 high-risk areas and in March 2008, it added a 28th, which is the planning for the 2010 Census. It states that the...

  • Strengthened Oversight Needed to Achieve Cost Savings Goal. Powner, David A. // GAO Reports;5/14/2013, following pi 

    The article offers information on a reports issued by the U.S. Government Accountability Office regarding the consolidation of various federal data centers in the country. It states that the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative launched by the officials of the U.S. Office of Management...

  • Electronic Government: Federal Agencies Have Made Progress Implementing the E-Government Act of 2002: GAO-05-12. Linda D. Koontz // GAO Reports;12/10/2004, p1 

    The E-Government Act (E-Gov Act) of 2002 was enacted with the general purpose of promoting better use of the Internet and other information technologies to improve government services for citizens, internal government operations, and opportunities for citizen participation in government. Among...

  • Electronic Government: Funding of the Office of Management and Budget's Initiatives: GAO-05-420. Koontz, Linda // GAO Reports;4/25/2005, p1 

    In accordance with the President's Management Agenda, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has sponsored initiatives to promote electronic government--the use of information technology, such as Web-based Internet applications, to enhance government services. Generally, these "e-gov"...

  • Electronic Commerce.  // Army Lawyer;Jan/Feb2003, Issue 359, p62 

    Focuses on the Electronic-Government initiatives introduced by the federal agencies in the U.S. Aim to address redundant and overlapping of agency actions; Key components of the e-government strategy; Creation of an e-government position in the Office of Management and Budget.

  • Improvements Needed to Monitoring and Evaluation of Rules Development as Well as to the Transparency of OMB Regulatory Reviews.  // GAO Reports;5/11/2009, preceding p1 

    The article presents a study on the rulemaking process conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office. It investigates how broadly applicable rulemaking requirements have affected federal agencies' rulemaking processes. It assesses selected rules issued between January 2006 and May 2008....

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics