MassDEP Levies Penalty Against Environment Restoration Services

October 2009
Solid Waste Report;10/29/2009, Vol. 40 Issue 16, p3
The article discusses the 16,700 U.S. dollars penalty levied by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) against Environmental Restoration Services Corporation of Lawrence for asbestos regulations violation.


Related Articles

  • Donor's gift causes OSHA fines for fire department.  // HR Specialist: North Carolina Employment Law;Apr2012, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p5 

    The article reports that Indian Beach-Salter Path Fire Department is facing fines of $10,838 after removing 120 ceiling asbestos tiles from the home of the donor.

  • Asbestos work employee fears ignored.  // RoSPA Occupational Safety & Health Journal;Oct2004, Vol. 34 Issue 10, p3 

    Reports on the fine imposed on Nuneaton, England-based Dalebrick Ltd. and its officers by the Birmingham Crown Court in relation to the removal of asbestos. Background on the case; Provisions of the law on working with asbestos; Guilty plea to breaching various provisions of the law by the...

  • Asbestos risks ignored.  // RoSPA Occupational Safety & Health Journal;Mar2010, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p7 

    The article reports on the 18,000 pounds penalty of Frank Bruce & Co. Ltd. due to exposure of its workers to asbestos in Bristol, England.

  • World Updates.  // Business Insurance;5/24/2004, Vol. 38 Issue 21, p13 

    More than half of Great Britain's businesses surveyed are likely to be in violation of new asbestos rules that took effect as of May 21, 2004. The Davies Arnold Cooper survey of 500 companies in Great Britain, conducted last month, found that 58 percent respondents had not carried out an...

  • Asbestos fines risk.  // Printing World;11/4/2004, Vol. 288 Issue 7, p20 

    This article reports that printing businesses in Great Britain are at risk from heavy fines from tough new regulations on asbestos management. The changes to the Health and Safety law, which came into force earlier in the year, are expected to affect half a million commercial, industrial and...

  • Massachusetts DEP Fines ALCS For Asbestos Rules Violations.  // Hazardous Waste/Superfund Alert;3/9/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p5 

    The article reports that ALCS Inc. has been assessed with a penalty of 54,937 dollars by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (Massachusetts DEP) for an alleged multiple violations of state asbestos regulations.

  • Builder fined for asbestos danger.  // RoSPA Occupational Safety & Health Journal;May2006, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p8 

    Reveals that Andrew Newton of R&A Builders has been fined £9,000 regarding the disposal of roof material which contained asbestos. History of the case; Responsibilities of a company in organising the disposal of their waste; Importance of proper and safe management of waste. INSET: Managing...

  • Ohio Firms Agree to Penalties For Alleged Asbestos Violations.  // Hazardous Waste/Superfund Alert;9/21/2010, Vol. 32 Issue 16, p3 

    The article reports on the announcement of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OHIO EPA) that two companies have agreed to pay for 16,250 dollars penalties to settle alleged asbestos violations involving work at the former Masonic Temple in Columbus.

  • M&S' £1m fine for asbestos failings.  // RoSPA Occupational Safety & Health Journal;Nov2011, Vol. 41 Issue 11, p2 

    The article reports on the decision of the Winchester Crown Court that orders Marks & Spencer PLC and its contractors to pay 1 million pounds for putting the public at risk of exposure to asbestos-containing materials during the restoration of two stores in England in 2006 and 2007.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics