TITLE

A Matter of Fact

AUTHOR(S)
Darras, Frank N.
PUB. DATE
March 2010
SOURCE
Best's Review;Mar2010, Vol. 110 Issue 11, p79
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the implication of disability policies that has been govern under the Employee Retirements Income Security Act of 1974 in the U.S. It cites the case Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals which addressed the issue disability insurance. Accordingly, the court held that the reviewing court must take the conflict into account, which entails a more complex application of the abuse-of-discretion standard.
ACCESSION #
48633799

 

Related Articles

  • OTHER Recent DECISIONS.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Dec2008, Vol. 42 Issue 12, p15 

    The article presents several court cases related to employee benefits industry. In a case involving breach of fudiciary duty, a plaintiff's allegation that the defendant used claims management policies was dismissed by the court. In relation to retiree health benefits, the court made a...

  • Value of group life for execs is in the options. Kristian, Christopher R. // Benefits Selling;Sep2010, Vol. 8 Issue 9, p67 

    The article discusses group life insurance programs that benefit executives and older employees while they are employed and when they retire. These programs are portable and cost-effective and can protect executives from higher income taxes while employed. The main categories for these programs...

  • Court Reinstates Disability Benefits for Failure to Comply With ERISA.  // Legal-Legislative Reporter;Jul2007, Vol. 41 Issue 7, p8 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the U.S. Court of Appeals denied the appeal of the defendant-company, where it acted capriciously and arbitrarily denied the plaintiff's application for long-term disability benefits. Accordingly, defendant-company did not satisfy the notice...

  • Court Disputes Plan Administrator's Duty to Investigate.  // Benefits Magazine;Jan2014, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p52 

    The article discusses the court case Truitt v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America. The case arose from the decision of the defendant to end the plaintiff's long-term disability benefits after a man sent electronic mails that rebut the plaintiff's disability. The district court said the defendant...

  • BIG COMPANIES AT THE LEADING EDGE OF BENEFITS CAPTIVES TREND. GEISEL, JERRY // Business Insurance;2/16/2015, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p0006 

    The article focuses on the use by large companies of captive insurers to reduce the cost of benefits for employees and retirees. Topics covered include the growing interest in the alternative to traditional insurance, the benefit of the approach to Deutsche Post's collection of health claims...

  • FIDUCIARY DUTY.  // Benefits Quarterly;2012 Third Quarter, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p54 

    The article discusses several court cases related to fiduciary duty. In Faber v. MetLife, the Second Circuit sided with the U.S. Department of Labor which held that in creating a checking account for beneficiaries, MetLife did not act as a fiduciary to an employee benefit plan and MetLife's...

  • Group Life To the Rescue. Panko, Ron // Best's Review;Feb2007, Vol. 107 Issue 10, p30 

    The article reports on the development of group life insurance benefits offered to retirees to address the condition of employee shortages in companies. It was shown that group life insurance coverage offered to retired employees can help motivate retirees to re-enter or stay in their job. Laws...

  • Call to Action. Jerome, Chris // Best's Review;Nov2006, Vol. 107 Issue 7, p42 

    The article focuses on the global trends that pose challenges to the disability insurance market in the U.S. The U.S. Census Bureau indicated that the increased number of workers older than 55 implies more costly disability leaves of greater duration. There is a need for products to provide...

  • Restricted Stock Units Properly Valued at Retirement.  // Benefits Magazine;Mar2011, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p50 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the defendant alleged the correctness of the calculation of benefits under the restricted stock units (RSUs) at his retirement. The U.S. Court of Appeals examined the regulation under the Internal Revenue Code 409A in valuing the restricted stock units...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics