Mandatory review panels pushed for tort reform

March 2010
Healthcare Risk Management;Mar2010, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p32
Malpractice tort reform could be achieved by requiring a physician panel to review all cases before proceeding to court, some advocates say. The proposal is opposed by trial lawyers, who say the panel would be biased in favor of defendants. ∎ The panel could decrease the costs of defensive medicine. ∎ Plaintiffs would have to pay court costs if they proceed without merit. ∎ The plan would be more extensive than current state requirements.


Related Articles

  • Bad things can happen to good doctors -- and their patients. Stultz, Tara // Medical Economics;11/19/2010, Vol. 87 Issue 22, p14 

    The article focuses on the legal status of general practitioners (GPs) in the U.S. It states that even competent clinicians who apply the most current evidence-based clinical protocols may experience negative patient outcomes and something become a part of a litigation. It points on the medical...

  • Towards stricter disciplining of physicians.  // Patient Care;7/15/1995, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p13 

    Presents graphical information about the disciplinary action taken by the state medical boards against erring physicians, from 1990 to 1994.

  • Florida to name names.  // Modern Healthcare;03/10/97, Vol. 27 Issue 10, p41 

    Reports on the release of a report by Agency for Health Care Administration on doctors who have been punished or who paid multiple malpractice claims. Reaction of Florida Medical Association to release of this report; Reference to Massachusetts release of a similar report.

  • Defensive medicine and medical malpractice.  // People's Medical Society Newsletter;Feb95, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1 

    Presents the findings of a study on the practice of defensive medicine conducted by the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) of the United States Congress. Definition of defensive medicine; High cost of defensive medicine; Effect of reform in malpractice law on costs; Efficiency of the legal...

  • Senate fight looms over tort reform.  // Ophthalmology Times;4/3/95, Vol. 20 Issue 14, p9 

    Predicts that legislation on physician malpractice will have a difficult passage in the Senate.

  • Urgent, interim suspension mooted. Ratcliffe, Lucy // New Zealand Doctor;11/3/2010, p2 

    The article reports that the Medical Council of New Zealand wants the authority to suspend doctors as soon as it finds serious concerns about their actions and competence.

  • Constitutional rights versus malpractice insurance settlements. Trentalance, Albert E. // Physician Executive;Aug1994, Vol. 20 Issue 8, p7 

    Discusses a statutory right which allows malpractice insurance companies to settle malpractice claims regardless of the desires of the defending physician. Increase in costs and complexity of malpractice litigation; Description of the Health Care Quality Act of 1986; Consultation with the...

  • Reform of the Health Care System and Professional Liability. Todd, James S. // New England Journal of Medicine;12/2/93, Vol. 329 Issue 23, p1733 

    Looks at the issue of liability for physicians and other health care providers as it relates to the issue of health care reform in the United States. Discussion of the current atmosphere surrounding questions of liability; Malpractice; More.

  • Medical Council told it was wrong to discipline doctor. McMillan, Virginia // New Zealand Doctor;5/8/2013, p8 

    The article reports on the ruling made by Justice Robert Dobson on the decision of Medical Council in New Zealand to discipline a doctor who had formed a relationship to a breast-cancer patient.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics