TITLE

Supreme Court turns away NPDES review

PUB. DATE
March 2010
SOURCE
Southwest Farm Press;3/4/2010, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to review a ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals which may demand farmers who want to apply pesticides to or near water sources to get National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit.
ACCESSION #
48607551

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court issues favorable decision in False Claims Act case.  // AHA News;6/23/2008, Vol. 44 Issue 13, p8 

    The article reports on a decision issued by the U.S. Supreme Court that False Claims Act (FCA) liability cannot be based merely on allegations that federal funds were used to pay a false claim. This decision was opposed to the ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit that the...

  • METRISH V. LANCASTER. Quiñones-Betancourt, Cristina; Taylor, Nathan // Federal Lawyer;Jun2013, Vol. 60 Issue 5, p82 

    The article discusses the court case Metrish v. Lancaster appealed from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court as of June 2013 regarding the petition filed by defendant's Burt Lancaster for a writ of habeas corpus against federal district court.

  • Severance benefits may not be subject to FICA taxes: Consider filing a protective refund claim soon. Goller, Michael G.; Barnes, Amy L. // On Balance;May/Jun2013, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p22 

    The article discusses the court case United States v. Quality Stores in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit confirmed that certain severance amounts paid to employees upon involuntary termination of employment related to reduction in workforce or plant closing were not...

  • Sixth Circuit strikes down affirmative action. Czurak, David // Grand Rapids Business Journal;12/3/2012, Vol. 30 Issue 49, p14 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit to overturn the prohibition on affirmative action in college admissions. Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the initiative based on the Michigan Civil Rights...

  • Sixth Circuit Continues Stay.  // Between the Lines (10807551);4/3/2014, Issue 2214, p6 

    The article focuses on the issuance of stay order by a Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 25, 2014, citing the U.S. Supreme Court's issuance of a stay, related to the case DeBoer v. Snyder regarding ban on same-sex marriage in Michigan.

  • Controlled Drug Purchases and the Probable Cause Necessary to Issue a Search Warrant. Smith, Jason R. // Tennessee Bar Journal;Oct2015, Vol. 51 Issue 10, p22 

    The article focuses on the rise in split of authority between the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals and the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals after the State v. Archibald decision of Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals regarding the controlled purchase of drugs and the necessity of the...

  • A Precedential Debate. GUSTAFSON, JOHN P. // ABI Journal;Oct2015, Vol. 34 Issue 10, p14 

    The article discusses various aspects related to the bankruptcy courts being made to follow the precedents created by the U.S. Supreme Court. It discusses the initiatives taken by the author, as a lawyer, to include Ohio in the use of § 522 (f) U.S. code, to strip judgment liens in...

  • U.S. Supreme Court Will Determine Whether a Change in the Conditions for Receiving Accrued Benefits Violates ERISA's Anti-Cutback Rule. Bernardin, Margaret R.; Pearson, David A. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2003 Q4, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to review the judgment made by the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the legal case Heinz versus Central Laborers' Pension Fund in 2003. The appeals court ruled that an amendment to a pension plan that expanded the definition...

  • Flexible foam firms want judicial review of class action.  // Urethanes Technology International;2015, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p0014 

    The article reports that flexible foam companies of the U.S. demand for Supreme Court review on a class action by which they will face pay outs. Topics discussed include pay out to class members for purchase of polyurethane foam products, petition filed by Carpenter and Woodbridge Foam Corp to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics