Supreme Court Reinstates Clean Air Standards, Rejects Improper Delegation Challenge

Brax, Jeff
August 2001
Ecology Law Quarterly;2001, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p541
Academic Journal
Discusses the United States Supreme Court decision on a Clean Air Act case which rejected the improper delegation challenge against important environmental regulations. Court ruling on the case by the Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. in 1999; Implications to the Environmental Protection Agency.


Related Articles

  • High Court Not In A State Of Denial. Lazarus, Richard // Environmental Forum;Jan/Feb2004, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p10 

    Discusses whether the U.S. Supreme Court will grant requests for reviews of environmental law cases in the U.S. Information on a pending decision of the Supreme Court for the case U.S. Environmental Protection Agency versus Sierra Club; Details of environmental law cases granted by the Supreme...

  • Air Transport Rule Upheld; Impact Uncertain. Hunter, Pam // ENR: Engineering News-Record;5/12/2014, Vol. 274 Issue 3, p9 

    The article focuses on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding an air-quality rule for emissions. Topics discussed include information on the case EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), and the potential impact of the ruling on the upcoming emissions...

  • NEBRASKA SEEKS HIGH COURT REVIEW OF ARSENIC COMPLAINT.  // Journal: American Water Works Association;Aug2004, Vol. 96 Issue 8, p24 

    Deals with the complaint filed by Nebraska to the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the rejection of its claim on illegal revision of the arsenic standard by the Environmental Protection Agency in March 2003. Overview of the complaint; Explanation from the agency for clarifying the arsenic...

  • The Oakland Tribune.  // Hill;9/11/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 103, p28 

    The article reports on the Supreme Court ruling allowing California to protect its environment. California has been trying to persuade the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to allow the state to protect the environment for nearly two years. According to the author, there is no reason...

  • High sourt says EPA must regulate GHG. McGowan, Elizabeth // Waste News;12/24/2007, Vol. 13 Issue 17, p12 

    The article reports on issues concerning the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling that empowers the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate CO2 and other heat-trapping gases emitted by cars. It is informed that many ebullient environmental groups, business leaders and legislators supported the...

  • Supreme Court rules against EPA; Ruling seen as a victory for mining industry.  // Mining Engineering;Aug2015, Vol. 67 Issue 8, p10 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has reversed the U.S. Prime Minister Barack Obama administration's Clean Air Act rule and said that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had not considered the costs of the regulation. It informs that Justice Antonin Scalia ruled that the...

  • Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit. Schmidt, Lorie J. // Federal Register;8/6/2012, Vol. 77 Issue 151, p46756 

    The article presents a notice of a proposed consent decree from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). The purpose of the notice is outlined which aims to address a lawsuit filed by WildEarth Guardians in the U.S. District Court for the...

  • Notices: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.  // Federal Register (National Archives & Records Service, Office of;5/19/2014, Vol. 79 Issue 96, p28710 

    The article presents a notice of final actions issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The document announces that between July 1, 2008 and April 15, 2014, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) has issued five final agency actions and the Region 2 Office...

  • 2007-2008 ENVIRONMENTAL LAW SURVEY: A SYSTEM IN FLUX. Smith, Freedom S. N.; Andres, Jennifer; Krahulik, Angela // Indiana Law Review;2009, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p973 

    The article discusses the findings of a survey of U.S. federal state court rulings concerning environmental law from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008. It cites the need for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and several states to review their policies on air quality following the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics