TITLE

Back to the state

PUB. DATE
February 2010
SOURCE
Railway Gazette International;Feb2010, Vol. 166 Issue 2, p24
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article reports on the decision of the Bolivian government that the national rail network should be returned to the public sector in 2010.
ACCESSION #
48457992

 

Related Articles

  • PRIVATIZATION HITS THE BUFFERS. Johnson, Mark // Global Finance;Feb2002, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p6 

    Reports on the Dutch government's takeover of management of railways in the Netherlands. Percentage of Dutch trains that ran on time during 2001; Annual public subsidies of Europe's railway.

  • ECONOMICS. H. W. // America;11/22/1913, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p166 

    The article focuses on the report that a British Royal Commission is considering the advisability and, if possible, the practical way of nationalizing the railways in England. It cites the potential benefits and disadvantages of state ownership for the government, among capitalists and to the...

  • WRONG TYPE OF PEOPLE. Ford, Roger // Modern Railways;Nov2015, Vol. 72 Issue 806, p33 

    The article discusses the author's views on the wrong type of people that highlight government support over renationalisation of British Rail and ignore the passenger numbers that generate revenue.

  • Nationalization? No!  // Time;10/19/1953, Vol. 62 Issue 16, p30 

    The article cites the findings of a Gallop poll on whether the U.S. government should own banks, railroads and coal mines. The poll found that Democrats like nationalization better than Republicans. It also discovered that education and occupation influence views on nationalization. The Gallop...

  • SHOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWN AND OPERATE THE RAILROADS? PRO. Lipkowitz, Irving // Congressional Digest;Aug/Sep39, Vol. 18 Issue 8/9, p209 

    Present the reprint of the arguments first published in the pamphlet "The Railroads Versus Public Interest" by Irving Lipkowitz of the U.S.-based League for Industrial Democracy arguing in favor of government ownership of the U.S. railroads. Benefits of public ownership of the transport...

  • SHOULD THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWN AND OPERATE THE RAILROADS? CON. Eastman, Joseph B. // Congressional Digest;Aug/Sep39, Vol. 18 Issue 8/9, p219 

    Presents the reprint of an article by Joseph B. Eastman published in "Barron's Weekly" on October 3, 1938 arguing against the U.S. government ownership of the nation's railroads. Details of the arguments.

  • The Railways' Mistake in Strategy.  // New Republic;2/16/18, Vol. 14 Issue 172, p71 

    Comments on the proposed railroad bill in the U.S. Fixed limit on government operation of railroads; Reaction of those who oppose government ownership; Opposition of railroad managers to government control of the railways.

  • Government Ownership of Railroads. Pro.  // Congressional Digest;Oct23, Vol. 3 Issue 1, p28 

    Presents arguments by the weekly magazine "The Nation," in favor of the government ownership of railroads. Criticism against the present system of private ownership.

  • Waiting for a change of owner. Cruddas, Jon // New Statesman;6/18/2007, Vol. 136 Issue 4849, p12 

    In this article the author examines the state of the British national rail system in 2007. He finds that the 1990s privatization of British Rail by the Conservative Party government of prime minister John Major resulted in a less efficient, less safe rail network. The author suggests that the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics