TITLE

On Genies and Bottles: Scientists’ Moral Responsibility and Dangerous Technology R&D

AUTHOR(S)
Koepsell, David
PUB. DATE
March 2010
SOURCE
Science & Engineering Ethics;Mar2010, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p119
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The age-old maxim of scientists whose work has resulted in deadly or dangerous technologies is: scientists are not to blame, but rather technologists and politicians must be morally culpable for the uses of science. As new technologies threaten not just populations but species and biospheres, scientists should reassess their moral culpability when researching fields whose impact may be catastrophic. Looking at real-world examples such as smallpox research and the Australian “mousepox trick”, and considering fictional or future technologies like Kurt Vonnegut’s “ice-nine” from Cat’s Cradle, and the “grey goo” scenario in nanotechnology, this paper suggests how ethical principles developed in biomedicine can be adjusted for science in general. An “extended moral horizon” may require looking not just to the effects of research on individual human subjects, but also to effects on humanity as a whole. Moreover, a crude utilitarian calculus can help scientists make moral decisions about which technologies to pursue and disseminate when catastrophes may result. Finally, institutions should be devised to teach these moral principles to scientists, and require moral education for future funding.
ACCESSION #
48409939

 

Related Articles

  • Research Ethics Consultation: The Stanford Experience. Cho, Mildred K.; Tobin, Sara L.; Greely, Henry T.; McCormick, Jennifer; Boyce, Angie; Magnus, David // IRB: Ethics & Human Research;Nov/Dec2008, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p1 

    The article offers information on the pilot program Benchside Ethics Consultation Service established by the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics in the U.S. The program aims to consider ethical issues involved in carrying out biomedical research by clinicians and scientists. It was found that...

  • How do morals change? Bloom, Paul // Nature;3/25/2010, Vol. 464 Issue 7288, p490 

    In this article, the author discusses the origin and cause of morality in research. He notes that people have little conscious control over their sense of right or wrong. He considers emotional and non-rational processes significant to moral change. He suggests psychologists to study the roles...

  • Ethics in Science: Pleasure and obligation? de Oliveira, Kleber Thiago // Orbital: The Electronic Journal of Chemistry;Apr-Jun2012, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p145 

    The author reflects on the role of scientists in the crisis of ethics in science. He mentions that there is no doubt that the entire essence of science, the pleasure of an attained target or discovery, has been lost among the requirements that cannot be controlled to produce increasing numbers....

  • Research integrity: An issue for scientific advancement. Das, Kusal K. // Medica Innovatica;Jul2015, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p1 

    The author reflects on research integrity as a significant issue for scientific development and as a basic moral attitude in science. He discusses topics including research misconduct and its impact to the researchers and science in general, the need for highest professional standards through...

  • Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: What's Wrong with It? Oderberg, David S. // Human Life Review;Fall2005, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p21 

    The article discusses the personal character and competence of scientists involved in human embryonic stem cell (HESC) research. Studies show that many scientists and bioethicists thought that the basic job for a stem cell researcher is to get on with their research and leave its implications to...

  • What happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory. Schuurbiers, Daan // Science & Engineering Ethics;Dec2011, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p769 

    In response to widespread policy prescriptions for responsible innovation, social scientists and engineering ethicists, among others, have sought to engage natural scientists and engineers at the 'midstream': building interdisciplinary collaborations to integrate social and ethical...

  • Ethics and the research scientist. Ely, John // American Scientist;Nov/Dec84, Vol. 72 Issue 6, p538 

    Focuses on the ethics of research scientists. Moral and ethical controversy surrounding major scientific research; Scientific sector's defense of its ethical position in a reactive mode; Role of the Sigma Xi in awakening interest in Honor Science.

  • Nobel laureate slams misconduct smear. Schiermeier, Quirin // Nature;2/20/2003, Vol. 421 Issue 6925, p773 

    Reports on the scientific misconduct complained by a post-doctoral researcher who used to work with 1996 Nobel prize winner Rolf Zinkernagel. Allegation that the data in the manuscript submitted to 'Science' were manipulated and listed her as co-author without her consent.

  • Teaching scientific ethics. Barden, Laura M.; Frase, Priscilla A. // American Biology Teacher (National Association of Biology Teache;Jan1997, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p12 

    Focuses on the importance of scientific ethics to scientific research. Definition of scientific ethics; Reasons why there is a need of scientific ethics; Case method as essential technique for discussing scientific ethics for students.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics