B of A to Pay $150 M to Settle Merrill Deal Claims
Related Articles
- Ruling Due Feb. 19 on B of A/SEC Pact. // American Banker;2/9/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 21, p16
This article reports that the U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff of New York City will decide by February 19, 2010 whether he will approve an 150 million dollar settlement agreement between the bank holding company Bank of America Corp. (B of A) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
- Waive the Flag. Maleske, Melissa // InsideCounsel;Jan2010, Vol. 21 Issue 217, p18
The article looks at several issues of attorney-client privilege that were raised during ongoing investigations into the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America (BofA). The bank was sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for failing to disclose the bonuses to...
- SEC v. Bank of America: Where to Go From Here? Gorman, Thomas O. // On Wall Street;Oct2009, Vol. 19 Issue 10, p20
The article discusses the case filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Bank of America Corp. for allegedly misleading shareholders when they voted to acquire Merrill Lynch filed in August 2009. The settlement, rejected by the federal court included a permanent...
- 3 More Settlements In Securities Case. // American Banker;6/4/2009, Vol. 174 Issue 106, p2
The article discusses settlements in securities cases. Bank of America Corp., Royal Bank of Canada's RBC Capital Markets, and Deutsche Bank AG all settled civil charges which were filed by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Attorney General's office accusing them of...
- Judge Won't Rule on SEC Settlement With B of A Until Feb. 19. Hume, Lynn // Investment Management Weekly;2/9/2010, p1
The article reports on the decision of New York federal judge Jed Rakoff not to issue a rule on whether to accept the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission settlement with Bank of America. The case involved allegations that Bank of America misled shareholders and the federal government about...
- Past, Present, and Future of SEC's Penalty Policy. Whitehouse, Tammy // Compliance Week;Apr2010, Vol. 7 Issue 75, p1
The article focuses on the settlement decision of federal district court judge Jed Rakoff regarding the civil fraud charges filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against the Bank of America (BofA) in New York City. It states that SEC has complained BofA's failure of providing...
- B of A Defends Merrill Pay. // American Banker;9/28/2009, Vol. 174 Issue 179, p12
The article reports that Bank of America Corp. made a formal response to the civil action filed by the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) over disclosure of bonuses paid to executives of Merrill Lynch & Co. after its 2008 acquisition of that company. A U.S. district judge rejected a...
- SEC Files Second Suit Against B of A. // American Banker;1/13/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 7, p16
The article reports that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued Bank of America for allegedly violating federal proxy rules by not disclosing losses at Merrill Lynch before a 2008 shareholder vote on their merger. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, New...
- SEC Charges Developer, Appraiser Over Rancho Lucerne Project Bonds. Hume, Lynn // Bond Buyer;2/26/2003, Vol. 343 Issue 31581, p4
Reports that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has filed securities fraud charges against the developer and appraiser of the proposed San Bernardino, California-based Rancho Lucerne residential golf course community. Overview of the lawsuit.
