TITLE

Quantifying the impact of community quarantine on SARS transmission in Ontario: estimation of secondary case count difference and number needed to quarantine

AUTHOR(S)
Bondy, Susan J.; Russell, Margaret L.; Laflèche, Julie M. L.; Rea, Elizabeth
PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
BMC Public Health;2009, Vol. 9, p488
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Community quarantine is controversial, and the decision to use and prepare for it should be informed by specific quantitative evidence of benefit. Case-study reports on 2002-2004 SARS outbreaks have discussed the role of quarantine in the community in transmission. However, this literature has not yielded quantitative estimates of the reduction in secondary cases attributable to quarantine as would be seen in other areas of health policy and cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods: Using data from the 2003 Ontario, Canada, SARS outbreak, two novel expressions for the impact of quarantine are presented. Secondary Case Count Difference (SCCD) reflects reduction in the average number of transmissions arising from a SARS case in quarantine, relative to not in quarantine, at onset of symptoms. SCCD was estimated using Poisson and negative binomial regression models (with identity link function) comparing the number of secondary cases to each index case for quarantine relative to non-quarantined index cases. The inverse of this statistic is proposed as the number needed to quarantine (NNQ) to prevent one additional secondary transmission. Results: Our estimated SCCD was 0.133 fewer secondary cases per quarantined versus non-quarantined index case; and a NNQ of 7.5 exposed individuals to be placed in community quarantine to prevent one additional case of transmission in the community. This analysis suggests quarantine can be an effective preventive measure, although these estimates lack statistical precision. Conclusions: Relative to other health policy areas, literature on quarantine tends to lack in quantitative expressions of effectiveness, or agreement on how best to report differences in outcomes attributable to control measure. We hope to further this discussion through presentation of means to calculate and express the impact of population control measures. The study of quarantine effectiveness presents several methodological and statistical challenges. Further research and discussion are needed to understand the costs and benefits of enacting quarantine, and this includes a discussion of how quantitative benefit should be communicated to decision-makers and the public, and evaluated.
ACCESSION #
48253670

 

Related Articles

  • TO BE PARANOID IS THE STANDARD? PANIC RESPONSES TO SARS OUTBREAK IN THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION. Cheng, Cecilia // Asian Perspective;2004, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p67 

    Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was first reported in Guangdong, China in November 2002, followed by an outbreak in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) in early March 2003. Public anxiety has been widespread in both SARS-affected and SARS-unaffected regions. Population...

  • Planning for Epidemics – The Lessons of SARS. Weinstein, Robert A. // New England Journal of Medicine;6/3/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 23, p2332 

    The article presents an editorial on planning for epidemics. The epidemic consequences of and control measures for emerging diseases are governed to a large extent by their modes of transmission. To illustrate the need for epidemic-preparedness planning, the author uses the example of the...

  • The Impressive and Rapidly Expanding Knowledge Base on SARS. Hughes, James M. // Emerging Infectious Diseases;Feb2004, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p171 

    Talks about the expansion of knowledge about severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Actions taken by the World Health Organization in response to the outbreak of SARS; Information on reports released by the Institute of Medicine on the threats of infectious diseases and microbial threats.

  • HHS/CDC Legal Response to SARS Outbreak. Misrahi, James J.; Foster, Joseph A.; Shaw, Frederic E.; Cetron, Martin S. // Emerging Infectious Diseases;Feb2004, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p353 

    Before the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) legal authority to apprehend, detain, or conditionally release persons was limited to seven listed diseases, not including SARS, and could only be changed using a two-step...

  • Health is a global issue. Vicid &Ower // EMBO Reports;Jul2003, Vol. 4 Issue 7, p649 

    The article focuses on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), the first severe and contagious new disease to emerge in the twenty-first century. It was a crude and widely heard wake-up call for societies and authorities worldwide about the threat of infectious diseases in an era of global...

  • Something's in the Air. McCullagh, Declan // Reason;Aug/Sep2003, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p33 

    Discusses matters related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic as of August 2003. Spread of misinformation about SARS; Information on the U.S. Model Health Powers Act; Significance of technological advancement in the fight against the epidemic.

  • Will the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic recur? Carmo, E. H.; Barreto, M. L. // Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health;Nov2003, Vol. 57 Issue 11, p840 

    The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which appeared in China in November 2002 and disseminated rapidly to 29 countries, was the first emerging disease and the first pandemic of the current century. Although the announcement of the last case in June brought some relief, it also raised...

  • Behind the mask. Journey through an epidemic: some observations of contrasting public health responses to SARS. Syed, W. Q.; Sopwith, W.; Regan, M.; Bellis, M. A. // Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health;Nov2003, Vol. 57 Issue 11, p855 

    SARS has been called the first global epidemic of the 21st century and has been the cause of a massive and varied public health response in many countries of the world. This report describes observations made by two authors on a journey from Manchester in the United Kingdom to Chiang Mai in...

  • Use of Quarantine to Prevent Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome--Taiwan, 2003. Lee, M.L.; Chen, C.J.; Su, I.J.; Chen, K.T.; Yeh, C.C.; King, C.C.; Chang, H.L.; Wu, Y.C.; Hu, M.S.; Jiang, D.D.; Lin, W.F.; Lang, H.C.; Lin, T.; Lai, M.H.; Wang, J.T.; Chen, C.H. // MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report;7/25/2003, Vol. 52 Issue 29, p680 

    Describes the quarantine measures used in Taiwan and other control measures to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) as of July 25, 2003. Discussion on the need for further evaluation of quarantine; Types of exposures on close contact; Quarantine regulations for travelers arriving on...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics