TITLE

U.S. Special Operations: Context and Capabilities in Irregular Warfare

AUTHOR(S)
Olson, Eric T.
PUB. DATE
January 2010
SOURCE
JFQ: Joint Force Quarterly;2010 1st Quarter, Issue 56, p64
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the function of the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM). It states that the USSOCOM has become a strategically and proactive concentrated headquarters covering a two-fold mission and purpose since the 9/11 attack. The USSOCOM serves as advocate for the U.S. special operations forces (SOF) and for the development of headquarters and equivalent unit functions among allied nations.
ACCESSION #
48169420

 

Related Articles

  • Strength in the Pacific. Panneton, John A. // Sea Power;Sep2006, Vol. 49 Issue 9, p3 

    The article focuses on the strategic alliance of the U.S. and Japan military forces to deal with the post-September 11 world. They agreed to increase military cooperation, create a joint military operations center at Yokota Air Base, and the Japanese government will pay about 60 percent of the...

  • FOREVER CHANGED. Strawser, Craig // All Hands;Sep2002, Issue 1025, p14 

    Presents the views of several American sailors on how the events of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks changed their lives. Events during the attack; Involvement of the sailors in saving the lives of the victims; Position in the Armed Forces and extent of involvement in military...

  • Missed Perceptions. Vest, Jason // Government Executive;12/01/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 21, p68 

    The article focuses on psychological military operations (PSYOPS). The military services in the United States defines PSYOPS as the systematic process of conveying messages to selected foreign groups to promote particular themes that result in desired foreign attitudes and behaviors. Since the...

  • From the Ground Up. Wagner, R. J. // Special Warfare: The Professional Bulletin of the John F. Kenned;May/Jun2009, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p6 

    The article discusses the tactical facilities (TACFACs) of the U.S. Special Forces Command. It cites that the TACFACs are intended to provide stability, peace security, building the capacity of the host nation, and to transition authority to civilian control. Moreover, it indicates that the...

  • Dec. 12 was the last day an. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;3/2/2015, pA02 

    The article offers information on December 12, 2014 as the last day an American military was killed in Afghanistan in which the two-month stretch as the longest that the U.S. has gone with no combat death after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack.

  • Moving Swiftly on Land. Kemp, Ian; Biass, Eric H. // Armada International;Dec/Jan2007 Supplement, Vol. 30, p18 

    The article offers information on how the U.S. Army and other European armies are enhancing their special operations capabilities. Marine Corps Forces Special Operations Command will be comprised of 2600 marines and sailors when it become fully operational in 2010. The Special Parachute...

  • Thinking MISO: Linking Strategy to Selection. Bostick, Reginald J. // Special Warfare: The Professional Bulletin of the John F. Kenned;Oct-Dec2011, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p29 

    The article looks into the U.S. Special Operations Command's (USSOCOM) Military Information Support Operations (MISO) and the connection between USSOCOM's Command Strategy 2010 and MIS candidate selection. It describes the cognitive attributes and capabilities that should be considered in the...

  • European Defence: New Threats, New Missions, New Actors. Lindley-French, Julian // Military Technology;Jun2002, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p10 

    Focuses on the impact of the September 11 terrorist attacks on European defense. Need to shift defense planning from supply side to the demand side of security; Inadequacy of the role of combat troops in peacemaking; Views on the future of security and defense of Europe.

  • Terrorism and 'just war.' Cook, Martin L. // Christian Century;11/14/2001, Vol. 118 Issue 31, p22 

    Presents the challenges to moral frameworks for assessing the use of military force in response to terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001. Justification of the use of military force; Efforts to block off the money supplies of the terrorists; Legitimate end of war.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics