Heft Jr., Frank W.; Smith, David
June 1989
ABA Journal;Jun89, Vol. 75 Issue 6, p42
Presents opposing arguments on the issue of death penalty for U.S. teenagers who committed a capital offense. Objective criteria supporting the conclusion that the death penalty is unconstitutional punishment for juveniles; Emotional and psychological immaturity of adolescents; Consensus favoring capital punishment of juveniles.


Related Articles

  • Sentencing Juveniles to Adult Facilities Fails Youths and Society. Bilchik, Shay // Corrections Today;Apr2003, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p21 

    Argues against the sentencing of juveniles to adult correctional systems in the U.S. Laws on juveniles; Rationale used in legislation convicting juvenile offenders as adults; Solution to lowering the likelihood of violent crimes.

  • Death Be Not Proud. Valentine, Victoria L. // New Crisis (15591603);Nov/Dec2002, Vol. 109 Issue 6, p2 

    Focuses on the renewed issue of the death penalty for juveniles in the U.S. which was brought about by the investigation of John Lee Malvo, a 17-year-old suspect in a series of sniper shootings in Washington, District of Columbia. Information on the case of Malvo; Account of juvenile executions...

  • Despite Islamic law, Yemen bans teen death penalty. Peterson, Scott // Christian Science Monitor;2/2/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 49, p7 

    Concentrates on the Yemen ban on capital punishment for juvenile offenders under the age of 18, and how the United States is one of the few countries with the death penalty for teenagers.

  • Juvenile rights in peril. Eckenbrecht, Margaret // ABA Journal;Mar1996, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p106 

    Discusses the findings of the American Bar Association's report on how little justice juveniles get. Need to improve access to counsel and quality of representation; Novice lawyers' and judges' lack of training in juvenile law; Efforts to assist juvenile offenders.

  • Age of innocence,. Stansky, Lisa // ABA Journal;Nov96, Vol. 82 Issue 11, p60 

    Reports on the current efforts of states to toughen penalties and rewrite their laws concerning children and young offenders. Proposal that children who committed certain categories of crimes go directly to the adult system without benefit of hearings; Concerns raised by some observers opposed...

  • ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER v. SIMMONS: certiorari to the supreme court of missouri .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents U.S. Supreme Court case Roper, superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons, number 03-633, argued on October 13, 2004 and decided on March 1, 2005. The Court addresses whether it is permissible under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution to...

  • Court Will Examine Executions of Juveniles. St. Gerard, Vanessa // Corrections Today;Apr2004, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p21 

    Deals with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to examine the constitutionality of executions of juvenile offenders in the U.S. Analysis of standards in the interpretation of the Constitution; Administration of death penalty against juvenile offenders; Ruling of the Missouri Supreme Court...

  • At Issue. Anders, James C.; Brody, Richard J. // ABA Journal;Jun86, Vol. 72 Issue 6, p32 

    Presents the views of legal experts regarding the application of capital punishment to juvenile murderers in the U.S. Conceptual confusion regarding the issue of capital punishment for juveniles; Justifications for the use of the death penalty to deter crime; Policy implications on the judicial...

  • Just the Facts.  // Current Events;9/21/2001, Vol. 101 Issue 3, p4 

    Presents four questions related to capital punishment in the United States. Number of juvenile offenders on death row in the United States, as of September 21, 2001; Citizens guarantee under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics