Fresh Push In Senate For FDIC Reform

Blackwell, Rob
June 2001
American Banker;6/21/2001, Vol. 166 Issue 119, p1
Trade Publication
Reports on deposit insurance reform efforts in the United States. Legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate concerning deposit insurance; Coverage level per account.


Related Articles

  • Legislative Update.  // American Banker;8/9/2001, Vol. 166 Issue 153, p5 

    Presents an update on legislative bills that would affect the United States banking sector, as of August 9, 2001. Negotiation between both House of the U.S. Congress to iron out differences between their bankruptcy reform bills; Introduction of deposit insurance reform legislation; Holding of a...

  • Bill Would Raise Municipal Coverage. Blackwell, Rob // American Banker;5/21/2001, Vol. 166 Issue 97, p3 

    Reports that several United States representatives introduced a legislation in May 2001 that would raise the deposit insurance coverage limit for in-state municipal deposits. Introduction of a similar bill that would provide unlimited coverage for municipal deposits in the Senate in 2001;...

  • Extend TAG to Protect Community Banks. Gerrish, Jeffrey C. // American Banker;9/25/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 148, p9 

    The author offers opinions on the Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) program of the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) increasing the amount of bank accounts covered by deposit insurance. The Congress is urged to extend TAG for two years, as its scheduled end in 2012 is seen as...

  • Bipartisan fix for S&L fund going before House panel. Wexler, Celia Viggo // American Banker;7/25/1996, Vol. 161 Issue 141, p1 

    Reports on expectations that the US House Banking Committee will vote on a new, bipartisan plan for rescuing the thrift insurance fund. Provision for the banking industry to delay full payments of interest due on Financing Corp. bonds; Imposition of a one-time fee on thrift deposits to...

  • Bank panels agree to seek 1.25% cap on FDIC reserves. McConnell, Bill // American Banker;11/7/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 215, p2 

    Reports on a compromise between the Senate and the House of Representatives that would bar the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) from building its reserves beyond 1.25 percent. Reserve cap as a victory for banks; Opportunity for most banks to get deposit insurance for free; Question on how...

  • ABA: No Quick Win on Deposit Insurance. BlackwellL, Rob // American Banker;3/12/2001, Vol. 166 Issue 48, p3 

    Speculates on what top banking industry-related legislation will be the priority of the 2001 United States Congress. Recommendation of U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. for deposit insurance reform; Possibility of doubling deposit insurance coverage to $200,000 per account; Focus of the...

  • FDIC Will Seek Legislation To Raise Lid on Premiums. GUERRERO, KEVIN // American Banker;5/23/2000, Vol. 165 Issue 99, p6 

    Reports that the United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is seeking legislation to amend a 1996 law that prevents the agency from charging any fee to well-capitalized banks or thrifts holding the top two Camels performance ratings. Plans to overhaul the deposit insurance system; American...

  • If Two Tiers Work for Regulation, Why Not Deposit Insurance? H. Neely, Joseph // American Banker;3/20/2015, Vol. 180 Issue F312, p1 

    The article discusses a proposed two-tiered legislative solution that could give regulators the ability to create simpler rules for banks with simpler business models which can also be applied to Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) deposit insurance by separating risk concentrations existing...

  • DIRECTIVA 2014/49/UE, DE 16 DE ABRIL, RELATIVA A LOS SISTEMAS DE GARANTÍA DE DEPÓSITOS. SÁNCHEZ CERBÁN, ANTONIO // Actualidad Juridica (1578-956X);2014, Issue 38, p157 

    The purpose of the article is to briefly describe the main amendments introduced by the Directive 49/2014/EU on Deposit Guarantee Schemes and to analyse the potential impact of those amendments on the applicable Spanish legislation regarding this matter.

  • DEPOSIT INSURANCE IN SINGAPORE: WHY HAVE IT, WHO GETS IT, HOWDOES ITWORK? Annette Booysen, Sandra // Singapore Journal of Legal Studies;Jul2013, p76 

    The article offers information on the merits of the deposit insurance (DI) scheme of Singapore that was revised in 2011 to promote the safety and stability of the banking system. It analyzes the level of consumer protection and safety of depositors' rights offered under the DI provisions and...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics