TITLE

Do unpublished opinions hamper justice?

PUB. DATE
March 1978
SOURCE
American Bar Association Journal;Mar1978, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p318
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on failure of appellate judges in the United States to do their part to expedite judicial procedures. Negative impact of judges' unpublished opinions on case appeals; Need for justices to assert more control over court reporters.
ACCESSION #
4810048

 

Related Articles

  • No more pressing need. Graglia, Lino A. // Human Life Review;Summer96, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p37 

    Presents how the federal judges in the American society have been permitted to assume the role of the ultimate arbiters on the most fundamental moral issues. Meaning and purpose of the clauses `due process' and `equal protection'; Lawyers as policy makers on fundamental moral issues.

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AS "NORMAL SCIENCE" Massaro, Toni M. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2004, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p547 

    Takes aim at critics who argue for more formalism from the U.S. Supreme Court and who insist that the justices disregard the limits of the Constitution and of judicial authority when they extend equal protection or substantive due process protections to new terrain. Argument that the Court has...

  • Supreme Court to Consider When Litigants Are Contributors to Judges' Campaigns. Chalmers, Henry R. // Litigation News;Winter2008, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p21 

    The article reports on the Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Corp. case which will be considered by the U.S. Supreme Court, particularly the issue of due process and impartiality of judges. An overview of the facts of the case is provided, along with the decision of the Virginia state Supreme Court....

  • The Federal Right to an Adequate Education. Friedman, Barry; Solow, Sara // George Washington Law Review;Jan2013, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p92 

    Common wisdom has it that there is no federal constitutional right to an education; indeed, under our charter of negative liberties the common understanding is that there are no positive rights at all. This Article challenges common wisdom, arguing that there is in fact a federal constitutional...

  • THE MILITARY JUSTICE CONUNDRUM: JUSTICE OR DISCIPLINE? SCHLUETER, DAVID A. // Military Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 215, p1 

    The article presents an overview of the American military justice system as of March 2013, focusing on a reported conundrum involving military justice and discipline. Pretrial procedures and appellate review practices are addressed, along with military judges in the U.S. and a due process model...

  • About Judge Vaughn R. Walker: He Says Prop 8 Unconstitutional for Lack of Due Process & for Violation of Equal Protection Clause. Est├ęs, Dr. Clarissa Pinkola // Moderate Voice;8/4/2010, p2 

    The article presents the author's insights on the decision of Judge Vaughn R. Walker, the United States District Chief Judge to the Northern District of California, to declare the Proposition 8 unconstitutional. The author states that Judge Walker cited due process and equal protection clauses...

  • Litigation and Democracy: Restoring a Realistic Prospect of Trial. Burbank, Stephen B.; Subrin, Stephen N. // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 46 Issue 2, p399 

    The article explores the growing popularity among judges in the U.S. to dispose cases without trial also known as the "vanishing trial" phenomenon. Some of the reasons behind the concerns over the growing vanishing trial phenomenon include its impact on the due process of law and its effects on...

  • Understanding Caperton: Judicial Disqualification Under the Due Process Clause. Bam, Dmitry // McGeorge Law Review;Jan2011, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p65 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Caperton versus (v.) A.T. Massey Coal Co., which deals with judicial disqualification. It explains the role of appearances in recusal decisions in the nation. It argues that the majority opinion of Justice Kennedy in Caperton limited the role of...

  • The Oxymoron Reconsidered: Myth and Reality in the Origins of Substantive Due Process. Ely, Jr., James W. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer99, Vol. 16 Issue 2, p315 

    Traces the history of due process jurisprudence in the United States (US). Rights protected by due process laws; Origins from the Magna Carta document of 1215; Due process in jurisprudence before the US Civil War; Role of constitutional writer Thomas M. Cooley in its development.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics