TITLE

Improved outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection: a randomized multicenter trial

AUTHOR(S)
Cengiz, Yucel; Dalenbäck, Jan; Edlund, Gunnar; Israelsson, Leif A.; Jänes, Arthur; Möller, Mats; Thorell, Anders
PUB. DATE
March 2010
SOURCE
Surgical Endoscopy;Mar2010, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p624
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, dissection with electrocautery starts at the triangle of Calot. In a randomized single-center trial, the fundus-first method (dome down) using ultrasonic dissection was faster, involved less pain or nausea, and had a shorter postoperative sick leave. This may relate to the fundus-first method or to the ultrasonic dissection. In a multicenter trial, 243 elective patients were randomized to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy using electrocautery ( n = 85) or the fundus-first method using either electrocautery ( n = 81) or ultrasonic dissection ( n = 77). The fundus-first method had a shorter operating time with ultrasonic dissection (58 min) than with electrocautery (74 min; p = 0.002). The fundus-first method using ultrasonic dissection compared with electrocautery or the conventional method produced less blood loss (12 vs. 53 or 36 ml; p < 0.001) and fewer gallbladder perforations (26% vs. 46% or 49%; p = 0.005). Also, the pain and nausea scores at 4 and 6 h were lower, and the sick leave was shorter (6.1 vs. 9.4 and 9 days, respectively; p < 0.001). The fundus-first method using ultrasonic dissection is associated with less blood loss, fewer gallbladder perforations, less pain and nausea, and shorter sick leave than the conventional and fundus-first method using electrocautery. The difference seems related to the use of ultrasonic dissection.
ACCESSION #
48058260

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics