TITLE

Are senators immune from suit for crimes in official capacity?

PUB. DATE
April 1978
SOURCE
American Bar Association Journal;Apr78, Vol. 64 Issue 4, p528
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses cases that being heard before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1978. Immunity of senators from suit for crimes in official capacity in 'McClellan v. McSurely'; Issue of attorney fees in a civil rights case brought by inmates of the Arkansas prison system; Definition of community for obscenity prosecutions; Existence of a potential defense to price-fixing charges.
ACCESSION #
4804674

 

Related Articles

  • ORFF et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Orff et al. v. United States et al., case number 03-1566, argued on February 23, 2005 and decided on June 23, 2005. The case focuses on waiving of sovereign immunity from breach of contract suits under a provision of the Reclamation...

  • Curb on Legal Immunity Affects Some Districts. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;6/4/2003, Vol. 22 Issue 39, p22 

    The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling of May 2003, that states do not have immunity from lawsuits brought by their employees under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 has implications for school districts in some states. In its 6-3 decision in Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs, the...

  • Clinton encountering serious jurists. Tyrrell Jr., Emmett // Indianapolis Business Journal;07/07/97, Vol. 18 Issue 16, p4B 

    Opinion. Supports the decision of the US Supreme Court on the Paula Corbin case and the question of immunity of US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton against lawsuits originating in matters preceding his presidency. Statement that the Supreme Court will not be a party to the...

  • MIRANDA V. ARIZONA.  // Reader's Companion to American History;1991, p735 

    Information about the U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona is presented. The court has decided to hold the ban against self-incrimination enforced to an individual in police detention. The court also stated that questioning to a suspect should be done under the presence of an attorney and...

  • equal employment opportunity.  // Labor Law Journal;Jan87, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p63 

    Presents news briefs on labor case decisions in the U.S. as of 1987. Conclusion by the U.S. Supreme Court on the Riverside v. Rivera case that an award of attorney fees for successful prosecution of a case need not be proportionate to the damages obtained; Liability of supervisors for damages...

  • Supreme Court Report. Young, Rowland L. // American Bar Association Journal;Mar1978, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p432 

    Reports on the decisions of the United States Supreme Court on various cases as of March 1, 1978. Prosecutor's right in plea bargaining; Attorney's fees for successful Title VII defendant; Rights of the father of illegitimate child in adoption.

  • Supreme Court Decides Attorney Fees Not Available in Special Education Cases. Flygare, Thomas J. // Phi Delta Kappan;Sep84, Vol. 66 Issue 1, p66 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court's July 5, 1984 decision in 'Smith v. Robinson,' which provides an indication the issue of attorney fees may be important in education cases. Case background; Debate on whether the school board must pay students' attorney fees in school-related cases; Court's...

  • Stopping the Obscenity Madness 50 Years After Roth v. United States. Calvert, Clay; Richards, Robert D. // Texas Review of Entertainment & Sports Law;Fall2007, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1 

    The article proposes policy recommendations for addressing sexually explicit expression in the U.S. in light of the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court's 1957 decision in Roth v. U.S. It offers reasons for the abolishment of obscenity law in the U.S. It calls for the implementation of a Kids...

  • Obscenity and the Supreme Court. Blakey, G. Robert // America;8/13/1966, Vol. 115 Issue 7, p152 

    The article discusses the view of the U.S. Supreme Court on obscenity. The first reported obscenity case in Anglo-American jurisprudence was that of Sir Charles Sedley while the first reported action against a book was in 1708 with "The Fifteen Plagues of a Maiden-Head." On June 24, 2957, the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics