TITLE

REFORM LIBEL LAW?

PUB. DATE
April 1989
SOURCE
ABA Journal;Apr89, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p42
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on proposals to reform the libel law in the U.S. Election of a no-fault trial by parties for a declaratory judgment; Perceived benefits to media defendants and plaintiffs; Pros and cons to the proposed reforms; Implications on laws relevant to the press and the mass media.
ACCESSION #
4803821

 

Related Articles

  • MEDIA LAW AND ETHICS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE TORT OF DEFAMATION UNDER NIGERIAN LAW APPLYING THE COMMON LAW PERSPECTIVE. Ogwezzy, Michael C. // Mustang Journal of Law & Legal Studies;2012, Issue 3, p83 

    All communicators must be aware of the tort of defamation. The threat of such an action is probably the most serious curb to media freedom in all democratically established nations in the world. The media must be alert of defamatory action at every stage of publishing or broadcasting process....

  • Defamation Law in Bhutan: Some Reflections. Iyer, Venkat // Journal of Bhutan Studies;Summer2008, Vol. 18, p82 

    The article discusses a court case in Bhutan which involves its defamation and media law. The Thimpu District Court and High Court presided over the case in which the respective performances of both courts were considered promising even if the nascent legal infrastructure of the country has...

  • UNIFORM DEFAMATION LAWS IN AUSTRALIA: MOVING TOWARDS A MORE 'REASONABLE' PRIVILEGE? Breit, Rhonda // Media International Australia (8/1/07-current);Feb2011, Issue 138, p9 

    A new uniform defamation regime now operates in Australia. This article canvasses the Uniform Defamation Laws (UDLs), focusing on the defence of qualified privilege and its capacity to protect mass media publications in the public interest. Drawing on case law and analysis of the key approaches...

  • Refocusing Libel Law: Gross Irresponsibility and Naantaanbuu v. Abernathy. LEEPER, ROY V. // Communications & the Law;Sep98, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p67 

    Discusses the problems in the libel laws of the United States (US). Discussion on the gross irresponsibility standard; Implications of the gross irresponsibility standard for the libel law field; Discussion and conclusion.

  • The dangers of criminalizing speech. Bressers, Bonnie // Quill;Mar2003, Vol. 91 Issue 2, p8 

    Focuses on the existence and use of criminal defamation statutes in the U.S. Comparison of criminal defamation with civil defamation; Argument raised by critics of criminal defamation statutes; States in which criminal defamation statutes would be passed.

  • Is it time to change the libel doctrine for public figures?: It's a landmark to freedom of expression. Abrams, Floyd // ABA Journal;Jul85, Vol. 71 Issue 7, p38 

    Presents an affirmative opinion on the need to change the libel doctrine for public figures in the U.S. Focus on laws governing First Amendment rights and those of personal reputation; Details of a case involving libel and the publication of a false statement by a newspaper company;...

  • Is it time to change the libel doctrine for public figures?: Protect us from a reckless press. Cain, James P. // ABA Journal;Jul85, Vol. 71 Issue 7, p38 

    Reports on a negative opinion towards the need to change the libel doctrine for public figures in the U.S. Details of a case involving a libel suit filed against a newspaper company; Developments in defamation law; Implications on press laws and legislation.

  • THE "WIRE SERVICE" LIBEL DEFENSE. Youm, Kyu Ho // Journalism Quarterly;Autumn93, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p682 

    Examines the `wire service' libel defense in terms of its evolution in American law, its judicial status and its impact on the press. Evolution of the wire service defense from `Layne vs. Tribune Co.' libel case; Judicial interpretations of the wire service defense; Wire service defense as the...

  • 'START SPREADING THE NEWS': WHY REPUBLISHING MATERIAL FROM 'DISREPUTABLE' NEWS REPORTS MUST BE CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED. Buell, Keith C. // New York University Law Review;Oct2000, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p966 

    Argues for a revision of the neutral-reportage privilege that both protects the rights and reputations of defamed individuals. Origins of the pursuit-of-truth theory of the First Amendment and its incorporation into the constitutional law of libel; Exposition of modern media behavior and the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics