TITLE

Attorney-Client Privilege

AUTHOR(S)
Stern, Robert L.
PUB. DATE
September 1981
SOURCE
American Bar Association Journal;Sep81, Vol. 67 Issue 9, p1142
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the use of the control group theory as a limitation on the attorney-client privileges in corporate cases. Preliminary draft of the proposed Federal Rules of Evidence; Protection against compelled information disclosure; Functions of corporate attorneys; Consistency of the control group test with the principles of the common law.
ACCESSION #
4803635

 

Related Articles

  • 4 Myths About Attorney-Client Privilege. Griesing, Francine Friedman // Financial Executive;Dec2005, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p50 

    The article discusses aspects of attorney-client privilege as it pertains to corporations. Attorney-client privilege is designed to protect the client from the disclosure of confidential communications when the attorney is providing legal counsel. Corporate counsel is often misunderstood as...

  • US court rules on confidentiality. Roberts, John // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);6/29/96, Vol. 312 Issue 7047, p1629 

    Reports on the ruling made by the United States Supreme Court on the upholding of the confidentiality and protection from disclosure of communications between patients and their psychotherapists. Controversy generated by the Jaffee versus Redmond case in Chicago in relation to communications...

  • Supreme Court to hear Phelps protest case. Keen, Lisa // Bay Area Reporter;3/11/2010, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p8 

    The article reports that U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case of Snyder v. Phelps, which questions the jurisdiction of state law in requiring public disclosure of names of individuals who are signees of a domestic partnership law in Washington.

  • New Supreme Court Rulings on the Right to Sue. Widnall, William B. // Banking;May70, Vol. 62 Issue 11, p41 

    Discusses the intention of the U.S. Supreme Court to make it easier for the public to sue government agencies and businesses operating under government regulations. Provisions under the rule of corporate law; Overview of the Supreme Court's rule of self-restraint; Information on the Bank...

  • EXERCISE INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT.  // Defense Counsel Journal;Oct2003 Supplement, Vol. 70 Issue 4, p30 

    Deals with the duty of U.S. insurance lawyers to exercise independent professional judgment. Decision of the Supreme Court in the case, American Insurance Association v. Kentucky State Bar; Effect of the insurer's budgetary restrictions on the lawyer's duty to care.

  • DEAD MEN'S LAWYERS TELL NO TALES: THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE SURVIVES DEATH. Kremer, Jon J. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring99, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p941 

    In the case Swidler and Berlin v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that there is no posthumous exception to the attorney-client privilege for communications with substantial impact on criminal proceedings. In reaching its principal holding, the Court explicitly rejected the...

  • Do Communications Between Attorney and Client Remain Confidential After the Client's Death? PRO. Hamilton, James // Supreme Court Debates;Oct98, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p72 

    Presents excerpts from the brief for petitioners as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 29, 1998, regarding the confidentiality of communications between attorney and client after the client's death. Necessity of confidentiality to foster candor between client and attorney; Analysis of...

  • Do Communications Between Attorney and Client Remain Confidential After the Client's Death? CON. W. Starr, Kenneth // Supreme Court Debates;Oct98, Vol. 1 Issue 3, p73 

    Presents excerpts from the brief for the United States as submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on May 20, 1998, regarding the confidentiality of communications between attorney and client after the client's death. Analysis of principles that guide judicial analysis of privilege claims; Response...

  • Pumping the Disclosure Brakes after an Adverse Attorney-Client Privilege Ruling. Sims, Lanesha L. // Trial Practice;Summer2011, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p18 

    The author discusses a U.S. Supreme Court decision, highlighting the availability of appellate review for decisions adverse to the invocation of the attorney-client privilege. She discusses the aims of the attorney-client privilege, which she describes as the oldest of the privileges for...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics